assessment 3 4045

profilemarialex.perez55
rubrics3.docx

Criterion 1

Describe one's rationale for selecting a technology topic, including the process used to identify it.

Distinguished

Describes one's rationale for selecting a technology topic, including the process used to identify it, and the assumptions behind the selection process.

Proficient

Describes one's rationale for selecting a technology topic, including the process used to identify it.

Basic

Describes one's rationale for selecting a technology topic.

Non Performance

Does not describe one's rationale for selecting a technology topic, including the process used to identify it.

Criterion 2

Describe current evidence on the impact and relevance of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team. 

Distinguished

Describes current evidence on the impact and relevance of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team. Describes what makes each particular source of evidence an important contribution to the topic.

Proficient

Describes current evidence on the impact and relevance of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.

Basic

Identifies but does not describe current evidence on the impact and relevance of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.

Non Performance

Does not describe current evidence on the impact and relevance of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.

Criterion 3

Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation. 

Distinguished

Integrates well-researched and current evidence about the impact of a selected innovative patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation. Provides clear insight into the potential implications of the technology on patient safety and quality of care.

Proficient

Integrates current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation. 

Basic

Integrates some evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation, but the work lacks detail or is missing critical information.

Non Performance

Does not Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.

Criterion 4

Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting. 

Distinguished

Provides a scholarly, comprehensive, and well-researched description of organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.

Proficient

Describes organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting. 

Basic

Identifies but does not fully describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.

Non Performance

Does not describe organizational factors influencing the selection of a technology in the health care setting.

Criterion 5

Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting. 

Distinguished

Justifies the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting. Provides an in-depth and well-researched analysis of the impact of the technology on quality care and patient safety.

Proficient

Justifies the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting. 

Basic

Explains but does not justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting.

Non Performance

Does not justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a health care setting.

Criterion 6

Create a clear, well-organized, and professional, annotated bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 

Distinguished

Creates a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Proficient

Creates a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Basic

Provides an annotated bibliography that has errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling and exhibits a lack of preparation.

Non Performance

Does not create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Criterion 7

Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries. 

Distinguished

Follows APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references with flawless precision and accuracy.

Proficient

Follows APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries.

Basic

Partially follows APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Non Performance

Does not follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Criterion 8

Upload the Sentinel U telehealth simulation report showing completion.

Distinguished

Uploads the Sentinel-U telehealth SIM report and it is 86-100% complete.

Proficient

Uploads the Sentinel-U telehealth simulation report and it is between 31-85% complete.

Basic

Uploads the Sentinel-U telehealth simulation report, but it is only 30% complete.

Non Performance

Does Not upload the telehealth Sentinel-U simulation report.