Critical Decision Making for Providers
ritical Decision Making for Providers
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00% |
3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00% |
4 Good 80-89% 89.00% |
5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00% |
|
|
80.0 %Content |
|
|||||
|
20.0 %Scenario Description |
Description of scenario is not provided. |
Description of scenario is provided but is incomplete. |
Description of scenario is provided. |
Description of scenario is clear and accurate. |
Description of scenario is clear, accurate and comprehensive. |
|
|
60.0 %Discussion of Impact and Consequences of Failure to Report |
Discussion of the failure to report is not provided. |
Discussion of issues, their impact on the organization, and consequences is provided but is incomplete. |
Discussion of issues includes a brief description of organizational impact and consequences. |
Description of issues includes detailed information regarding organizational impact and consequences. |
Comprehensive and compelling discussion regarding the failure to report includes consequences with recommendations to address the issue with employees. |
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
5.0 %Format |
|
|||||
|
2.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
|
|
ritical Decision Making for Providers
1
Unsatisfactory 0
-
71%
0.00%
2
Less Than
Satisfactory 72
-
75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76
-
79%
79.00%
4
Good 80
-
89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90
-
100%
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
20.0 %Scenario
Description
Description of
scenario is not
provided.
Description of
scenario is
provided but is
incomplete.
Description of
scenario is
provided.
Description of
scenario is clear
and accurate.
Description of
scenario is clear,
accurate and
comprehensive.
60.0 %Discussion
of Impact and
Consequences of
Failure to Report
Discussion of the
failure to report is
not provided.
Discussion of
issues, their
impact on the
organization, and
consequences i
s
provided but is
incomplete.
Discussion of
issues includes a
brief description
of organizational
impact and
consequences.
Description of
issues includes
detailed
information
regarding
organizational
impact and
consequences.
Comprehensive and
compelling di
scussion
regarding the failure
to report includes
consequences with
recommendations to
address the issue
with employees.
15.0
%Organization
and
Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis
Development
and Purpose
Paper lacks any
discernible overall
purpose or
organizing claim.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
insufficiently
developed and/or
vague; purpose is
not clear.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
apparent and
appropriate to
purpose.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
clear
and forecast
the development
of the paper. It is
descriptive and
reflective of the
arguments and
appropriate to the
purpose.
Thesis and/or main
claim are
comprehensive;
contained within the
thesis is the essence
of the paper. Thesis
statement makes the
pur
pose of the paper
clear.
5.0 %Paragraph
Development
and Transitions
Paragraphs and
transitions
consistently lack
unity and
coherence. No
apparent
connections
between
paragraphs are
established.
Transitions are
inappropriate to
purpose and scope.
Organiza
tion is
disjointed.
Some paragraphs
and transitions
may lack logical
progression of
ideas, unity,
coherence,
and/or
cohesiveness.
Some degree of
organization is
evident.
Paragraphs are
generally
competent, but
ideas may show
some
inconsistency in
organizat
ion
and/or in their
relationships to
each other.
A logical
progression of
ideas between
paragraphs is
apparent.
Paragraphs exhibit
a unity,
coherence, and
cohesiveness.
Topic sentences
and concluding
remarks are
appropriate to
purpose.
There is a
sophistic
ated
construction of
paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas
progress and relate
to each other.
Paragraph and
transition
construction guide
the reader.
Paragraph structure
is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics
of Writing
(includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
languag
e use)
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
Inappropriate word
choice and/or
sentence
construction are
used.
Frequent and
repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies in
language choice
(regist
er),
sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
Some mechanical
errors or typos
are present, but
are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence
structure and
audience
-
appropriate
language are
used.
Prose is largely
free of mechanical
errors, although a
few may be
present. A variety
of sentence
structures and
effective figures
of speech are
used.
Writer is clearly in
command of
standard, written,
academic English.
ritical Decision Making for Providers
1
Unsatisfactory 0-
71%
0.00%
2
Less Than
Satisfactory 72-
75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-
79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Scenario
Description
Description of
scenario is not
provided.
Description of
scenario is
provided but is
incomplete.
Description of
scenario is
provided.
Description of
scenario is clear
and accurate.
Description of
scenario is clear,
accurate and
comprehensive.
60.0 %Discussion
of Impact and
Consequences of
Failure to Report
Discussion of the
failure to report is
not provided.
Discussion of
issues, their
impact on the
organization, and
consequences is
provided but is
incomplete.
Discussion of
issues includes a
brief description
of organizational
impact and
consequences.
Description of
issues includes
detailed
information
regarding
organizational
impact and
consequences.
Comprehensive and
compelling discussion
regarding the failure
to report includes
consequences with
recommendations to
address the issue
with employees.
15.0
%Organization
and
Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis
Development
and Purpose
Paper lacks any
discernible overall
purpose or
organizing claim.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
insufficiently
developed and/or
vague; purpose is
not clear.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
apparent and
appropriate to
purpose.
Thesis and/or
main claim are
clear and forecast
the development
of the paper. It is
descriptive and
reflective of the
arguments and
appropriate to the
purpose.
Thesis and/or main
claim are
comprehensive;
contained within the
thesis is the essence
of the paper. Thesis
statement makes the
purpose of the paper
clear.
5.0 %Paragraph
Development
and Transitions
Paragraphs and
transitions
consistently lack
unity and
coherence. No
apparent
connections
between
paragraphs are
established.
Transitions are
inappropriate to
purpose and scope.
Organization is
disjointed.
Some paragraphs
and transitions
may lack logical
progression of
ideas, unity,
coherence,
and/or
cohesiveness.
Some degree of
organization is
evident.
Paragraphs are
generally
competent, but
ideas may show
some
inconsistency in
organization
and/or in their
relationships to
each other.
A logical
progression of
ideas between
paragraphs is
apparent.
Paragraphs exhibit
a unity,
coherence, and
cohesiveness.
Topic sentences
and concluding
remarks are
appropriate to
purpose.
There is a
sophisticated
construction of
paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas
progress and relate
to each other.
Paragraph and
transition
construction guide
the reader.
Paragraph structure
is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics
of Writing
(includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
language use)
Surface errors are
pervasive enough
that they impede
communication of
meaning.
Inappropriate word
choice and/or
sentence
construction are
used.
Frequent and
repetitive
mechanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies in
language choice
(register),
sentence
structure, and/or
word choice are
present.
Some mechanical
errors or typos
are present, but
are not overly
distracting to the
reader. Correct
sentence
structure and
audience-
appropriate
language are
used.
Prose is largely
free of mechanical
errors, although a
few may be
present. A variety
of sentence
structures and
effective figures
of speech are
used.
Writer is clearly in
command of
standard, written,
academic English.