Critical Decision Making for Providers

profiletrooperwarxhw3
Rubrics.docx

ritical Decision Making for Providers 

 

1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00%

3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00%

4 Good 80-89% 89.00%

5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00%

80.0 %Content

 

20.0 %Scenario Description

Description of scenario is not provided.

Description of scenario is provided but is incomplete.

Description of scenario is provided.

Description of scenario is clear and accurate.

Description of scenario is clear, accurate and comprehensive.

60.0 %Discussion of Impact and Consequences of Failure to Report

Discussion of the failure to report is not provided.

Discussion of issues, their impact on the organization, and consequences is provided but is incomplete.

Discussion of issues includes a brief description of organizational impact and consequences.

Description of issues includes detailed information regarding organizational impact and consequences.

Comprehensive and compelling discussion regarding the failure to report includes consequences with recommendations to address the issue with employees.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

 

2.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

 

ritical Decision Making for Providers

1

Unsatisfactory 0

-

71%

0.00%

2

Less Than

Satisfactory 72

-

75%

75.00%

3

Satisfactory 76

-

79%

79.00%

4

Good 80

-

89%

89.00%

5

Excellent 90

-

100%

100.00%

80.0 %

Content

20.0 %Scenario

Description

Description of

scenario is not

provided.

Description of

scenario is

provided but is

incomplete.

Description of

scenario is

provided.

Description of

scenario is clear

and accurate.

Description of

scenario is clear,

accurate and

comprehensive.

60.0 %Discussion

of Impact and

Consequences of

Failure to Report

Discussion of the

failure to report is

not provided.

Discussion of

issues, their

impact on the

organization, and

consequences i

s

provided but is

incomplete.

Discussion of

issues includes a

brief description

of organizational

impact and

consequences.

Description of

issues includes

detailed

information

regarding

organizational

impact and

consequences.

Comprehensive and

compelling di

scussion

regarding the failure

to report includes

consequences with

recommendations to

address the issue

with employees.

15.0

%Organization

and

Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis

Development

and Purpose

Paper lacks any

discernible overall

purpose or

organizing claim.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

insufficiently

developed and/or

vague; purpose is

not clear.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

apparent and

appropriate to

purpose.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

clear

and forecast

the development

of the paper. It is

descriptive and

reflective of the

arguments and

appropriate to the

purpose.

Thesis and/or main

claim are

comprehensive;

contained within the

thesis is the essence

of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the

pur

pose of the paper

clear.

5.0 %Paragraph

Development

and Transitions

Paragraphs and

transitions

consistently lack

unity and

coherence. No

apparent

connections

between

paragraphs are

established.

Transitions are

inappropriate to

purpose and scope.

Organiza

tion is

disjointed.

Some paragraphs

and transitions

may lack logical

progression of

ideas, unity,

coherence,

and/or

cohesiveness.

Some degree of

organization is

evident.

Paragraphs are

generally

competent, but

ideas may show

some

inconsistency in

organizat

ion

and/or in their

relationships to

each other.

A logical

progression of

ideas between

paragraphs is

apparent.

Paragraphs exhibit

a unity,

coherence, and

cohesiveness.

Topic sentences

and concluding

remarks are

appropriate to

purpose.

There is a

sophistic

ated

construction of

paragraphs and

transitions. Ideas

progress and relate

to each other.

Paragraph and

transition

construction guide

the reader.

Paragraph structure

is seamless.

5.0 %Mechanics

of Writing

(includes

spelling,

punctuation,

grammar,

languag

e use)

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

Inappropriate word

choice and/or

sentence

construction are

used.

Frequent and

repetitive

mechanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies in

language choice

(regist

er),

sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

Some mechanical

errors or typos

are present, but

are not overly

distracting to the

reader. Correct

sentence

structure and

audience

-

appropriate

language are

used.

Prose is largely

free of mechanical

errors, although a

few may be

present. A variety

of sentence

structures and

effective figures

of speech are

used.

Writer is clearly in

command of

standard, written,

academic English.

ritical Decision Making for Providers

1

Unsatisfactory 0-

71%

0.00%

2

Less Than

Satisfactory 72-

75%

75.00%

3

Satisfactory 76-

79%

79.00%

4

Good 80-89%

89.00%

5

Excellent 90-100%

100.00%

80.0 %Content

20.0 %Scenario

Description

Description of

scenario is not

provided.

Description of

scenario is

provided but is

incomplete.

Description of

scenario is

provided.

Description of

scenario is clear

and accurate.

Description of

scenario is clear,

accurate and

comprehensive.

60.0 %Discussion

of Impact and

Consequences of

Failure to Report

Discussion of the

failure to report is

not provided.

Discussion of

issues, their

impact on the

organization, and

consequences is

provided but is

incomplete.

Discussion of

issues includes a

brief description

of organizational

impact and

consequences.

Description of

issues includes

detailed

information

regarding

organizational

impact and

consequences.

Comprehensive and

compelling discussion

regarding the failure

to report includes

consequences with

recommendations to

address the issue

with employees.

15.0

%Organization

and

Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis

Development

and Purpose

Paper lacks any

discernible overall

purpose or

organizing claim.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

insufficiently

developed and/or

vague; purpose is

not clear.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

apparent and

appropriate to

purpose.

Thesis and/or

main claim are

clear and forecast

the development

of the paper. It is

descriptive and

reflective of the

arguments and

appropriate to the

purpose.

Thesis and/or main

claim are

comprehensive;

contained within the

thesis is the essence

of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the

purpose of the paper

clear.

5.0 %Paragraph

Development

and Transitions

Paragraphs and

transitions

consistently lack

unity and

coherence. No

apparent

connections

between

paragraphs are

established.

Transitions are

inappropriate to

purpose and scope.

Organization is

disjointed.

Some paragraphs

and transitions

may lack logical

progression of

ideas, unity,

coherence,

and/or

cohesiveness.

Some degree of

organization is

evident.

Paragraphs are

generally

competent, but

ideas may show

some

inconsistency in

organization

and/or in their

relationships to

each other.

A logical

progression of

ideas between

paragraphs is

apparent.

Paragraphs exhibit

a unity,

coherence, and

cohesiveness.

Topic sentences

and concluding

remarks are

appropriate to

purpose.

There is a

sophisticated

construction of

paragraphs and

transitions. Ideas

progress and relate

to each other.

Paragraph and

transition

construction guide

the reader.

Paragraph structure

is seamless.

5.0 %Mechanics

of Writing

(includes

spelling,

punctuation,

grammar,

language use)

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

Inappropriate word

choice and/or

sentence

construction are

used.

Frequent and

repetitive

mechanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies in

language choice

(register),

sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

Some mechanical

errors or typos

are present, but

are not overly

distracting to the

reader. Correct

sentence

structure and

audience-

appropriate

language are

used.

Prose is largely

free of mechanical

errors, although a

few may be

present. A variety

of sentence

structures and

effective figures

of speech are

used.

Writer is clearly in

command of

standard, written,

academic English.