Cross-Cultural Essay
REFLECTIVE PROJECT-REFLECTIVE PAPER RUBRIC / PTS. POSSIBLE: 50
NOTE: If the paper is off topic, the student must re write the paper. If the paper is under 300 words, the grade can be no higher than a 25. If the paper is between 300 and 375 words, the grade can be no higher than a 35.
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM |
||
|
ITEM |
POINTS POSSIBLE |
1 - 2 |
3 - 4 |
5 |
|
Completion of assignment |
5 |
Paper is under 300 words and author did not fully develop any subpoint. |
Paper is between 300 and 399 words and author fully developed most subpoints. |
Paper is a between 400 and 600 words and author fully developed required number of subpoints. |
|
Adherence to MLA guidelines |
5 |
Paper does not conform to MLA guidelines |
Most of the paper conforms to MLA guidelines |
Paper fully conforms to MLA guidelines |
|
Punctuation accuracy |
5 |
Several punctuation errors found in content |
Minor punctuation errors found in paper |
Paper is free of punctuation errors |
|
Grammatical accuracy |
5 |
Significant grammar errors found in content |
Minor grammar errors found in paper |
Paper is free of grammar errors |
|
Academic writing skills displayed in paper |
5 |
Rudimentary display of academic writing skills |
Adequate display of academic writing skills |
Excellent display of academic writing skills |
|
Organization/ structure |
5 |
Most content is disorganized |
Most content is organized |
Content is well organized |
|
Research cited and referenced |
5 |
Poor level of research cited or referenced in paper |
Adequate use of research |
Excellent use of research |
|
Content supportive of paper’s argument(s) |
5 |
Most content does not support the paper’s argument(s) |
Most content supports the paper’s argument(s) |
Content fully supports the paper’s argument |
|
Development of specific and tightly related sub points |
5 |
Less than half of the paragraphs contain one specific point that is fully developed in them |
Most paragraphs contain one specific point that is fully developed in them |
Every paragraph contains one specific point that is fully developed in them |
|
Critical thinking skills displayed in writing |
5 |
Inadequate display of critical thinking skills in writing |
Adequate display of critical thinking skills in writing |
Excellent display of critical thinking skills in writing |
REFLECTIVE PROJECT-PEER CRITIQUE RUBRIC
PTS. POSSIBLE: 20
|
POINTS POSSIBLE |
EXPLANATION
|
|
16 17 18 19 20 |
Student gives copious, quality feedback throughout the paper; there is a minimum of three (3) quality comments per paragraph, averaging around six (6) per page and a minimum of twelve (12) total; student uses the “track changes” feature to leave feedback or leaves the comments in a color other than black; student’s comments are insightful, relevant and useful in helping author improve her paper.
|
|
11 12 13 14 15 |
Student gives good feedback throughout the paper; there is a minimum of two (2) quality comments per paragraph, averaging around four (4) per page and a minimum of eight (8) total; student uses the “track changes” feature to leave feedback or leaves the comments in a color other than black; student’s comments are insightful, relevant and useful in helping author improve her paper.
|
|
6 7 8 9 10 |
Student gives little feedback throughout the paper; there is a minimum of one (1) quality comment per paragraph averaging around two (2) per page; student’s comments are lacking in depth and are irrelevant or lacking in logic. Feedback hardly helps author improve her paper.
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
Student’s feedback is seriously lacking in depth and does not aid the author in improving her paper.
|
|
0 |
Student did not complete the assignment.
|
REFLECTIVE PROJECT-POWERPOINT RUBRIC
POINTS POSSIBLE: 30
|
AUDIO RECORDINGS
|
0 1 2 3 4 |
5 6 7 8 |
9 10 11 12 |
13 14 15 |
|
|
The audio is absent or incomprehensible. |
Audio is present and somewhat comprehensible. |
Audio is present and most sentences/ ideas flow. |
Audio is present, and information is presented in a logical and comprehensible fashion. |
|
CONTENT |
0 1 |
2 3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Content is irrelevant to topic |
Most points on slides do not support the topic nor do they help prove argument |
Most points on slides adequately support the topic and help prove argument |
Most points fully support the topic and help prove argument |
|
ORGANIZATION |
0 1 |
2 3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Content is presented in a disorganized fashion. |
Some content is presented in an organized fashion. |
Most content is presented in an organized fashion. |
Content is presented in a logical and organized fashion.
|
|
VISUAL ELEMENTS |
0 1 |
2 3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Presentation is missing visual elements.
|
Very few visual elements in the presentation. |
Good use of visual elements to support stance. |
Excellent use of visual elements to support stance. |