A research paper (Calculus III to Electromagnetic/Electrodynamics)
Course Title: Calculus for Engineers III Course #: MATH
Rubrics: Paper
|
Standards |
5 - 4 Exemplary |
3 - 2 Satisfactory |
1-0 Unacceptable |
|
Abstract |
Clearly states problem and question to be resolved; summarizes method, results, and conclusions |
Summarizes problem, method, results, and conclusions but lacks some details |
Is vague about the problem; does not provide a summary of the whole project |
|
Introduction |
Provides an introduction to the subject. Address the problem with clarity and a strong rationale/justification. States the objective of the study |
Provides an introduction to the subject but does not address the problem with clarity and a strong rationale/justification. Objective not clear |
Provides an introduction but does not describe the problem to be solved; fails to explain the study's details and objectives.
|
|
Literature Review |
Provides extensive background research into the topic and summarizes important findings from the literature review, including critical reading; justifies the current study; explains the significance of the problem. |
Provides some background research into the topic and describes the problem to be solved. Some crucial findings from the review of the literature are listed, but no critical reading or justification |
Provides some background research into the topic but does not describe the problem to be solved; fails to summarize essential findings from the literature review, including critical reading. |
|
Methodology |
Presents easy-to-follow steps that are logical and adequately detailed; include all needed equations |
Presents most of the steps but lacks in details or explanation of the procedure |
Misses procedural steps has steps that are not sequential, missing explanation |
|
Results and Discussion |
Provides a complete explanation of data and results |
Explains data and results with some aspects lacking detail |
Lacks description of data and results |
|
Conclusion |
Presents a logical explanation for findings; addresses recommendations and/or implications for further research or use/application |
Presents a logical explanation for findings |
It does not adequately explain the findings |
|
References |
Appropriately documents sources with journal papers |
Few or old documents sources |
Neglects important sources or documents few to no sources |
|
Writing Mechanics |
Is free or almost free of errors of grammar, spelling, and writing mechanics; |
Has errors, but they don't represent a significant distraction; |
Has many errors that obscure the meaning of content or add confusion; |
|
Overall Article Format |
The entire article follows the APA format, including article sections, subsections, figures, equations, appendix, references |
Has the wrong format in 1 or 2 items |
Has the wrong format in 3 or 4 items |
Plagiarism
Faculty Expectations of Students
· Cheating and Plagiarism are unacceptable under any circumstance; Students should ask what constitutes Plagiarism. The student's responsibility is to familiarize her with the plagiarism policy, which can be found in the Undergraduate Catalogue. For Assignments, term papers, and reports, accepted Plagiarism should be less than 10% when using Grammarly and 30% when using IThenticate.
2