Section B: Literature Support-katetutor

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00%

3 Satisfactory 88.00%

4 Good 92.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

100.0 %Literature Support Holistic Assessment

100.0 % Literature Support Summarize the research support for the project's problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional journals.

Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) the search method data without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or is outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work ignores or superficially evaluates the research strengths, and limitations, and draws unwarranted conclusions. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Work provides a basic overview of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution, and minimally includes any rationale, details and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research. Work lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work conducts a surface level of evaluation of the research strengths and limitations. Very narrow conclusions are provided. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Work provides a complete summary of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution in a concise manner, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research providing some detailed rationale, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work analyzes the research strengths and limitations and provides direct, competent, and appropriate conclusions. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of the subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Work provides a detailed summary of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution emphasizing the essential components, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research in-depth, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the research strengths and limitations, drawing warranted conclusions. The research support is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

100 % Total Weightage