|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation Memo
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Introduce and Summarize Plan
|
10 points
Clearly introduces and summarizes the security plan.
|
8 points
Basically introduces and summarizes the security plan.
|
6 points
Weakly introduces and summarizes the security plan.
|
3 points
Little introduction or summary of the security plan. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Doesn’t introduce or summarize the security plan.
|
|
Format, Grammar and Punctuation (Memo)
|
5 points
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
4 points
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 3 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
2 points
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 6 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
1 point
MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Non-MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. More than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
|
Security Strategy
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Describes Strategy
|
13 points
Clearly describes the security strategy being proposed. Strategy covers the confidentiality, integrity and availability.
|
10 points
Basically describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers most of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability.
|
7 points
Weakly describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers some of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability.
|
3 points
Little description of security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy may cover a few of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No description of security strategy solutions. Doesn’t address any of the following: confidentiality, integrity or availability.
|
|
Link Solutions
|
13 points
Clearly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
|
10 points
Basically describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
|
7 points
Weakly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy.
|
3 points
Little description of the linkage between each technology and the strategy. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No description of any linkage between each technology and the strategy.
|
|
Network Diagram
|
13 points
Clear, detailed network diagram that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
|
10 points
Basic network diagram with some details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
|
7 points
Network diagram with weak details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure.
|
3 points
Network diagram with little or no details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Missing or no network diagram.
|
|
Security Technologies
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Describes Technologies
|
13 points
Clearly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least three (3) technologies.
|
10 points
Basically describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least two (2) technologies.
|
7 points
Weakly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least one (1) technology.
|
3 points
Little description of technologies being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Doesn’t describe the technologies being proposed.
|
|
Costs, ROI, Mitigation and Barriers
|
13 points
Clear and detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
|
10 points
Basic, but detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
|
7 points
Weak and poorly detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
|
3 points
Little detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No sufficient details in the description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.
|
|
Finds and Applies Knowledge
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Use of Authoritative Sources
|
5 points
Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No APA style errors in sources.
|
4 points
Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.
|
2 points
Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.
|
1 point
May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May use NIST SP 800-53. May not have used APA style formatting.
|
0 points
No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper. NIST SP 800-53 not mentioned.
|
|
Citation of Sources
|
5 points
All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.
|
4 points
All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.
|
2 points
All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.
|
1 point
All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
0 points
No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
|
Organization, Execution and Appearance
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Formatting
|
5 points
Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
|
4 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
|
2 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
|
1 point
MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
|
0 points
Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.
|
|
Grammar and Punctuation
|
5 points
No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
4 points
Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
2 points
Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
1 point
Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
0 points
More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
|
Overall Score
|
Level 5
14 or more
|
Level 4
11 or more
|
Level 3
8 or more
|
Level 2
5 or more
|
Level 1
0 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hansbke17
RubricPorject4.docx
0
