RubricNoteTakingAssignment.docx
Note-taking of the introduction
|
Note-taking of the introduction
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
Identifying the main focus
In two or three sentences explain clearly what is the main claim that the writer is trying to make in the chapter and how it seems to contribute to the objectives laid out in the introduction.
|
|
2.0 pts
Good
Successfully identified the main claim in the text
|
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify the main claim of the introductory chapter
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
Claims in each subheading
Ability to identify the claims within each subheading, how examples are utilized and any evocative quotations
|
|
5.0 pts
Good
Successfully identifies the main claim being made in each subsection and successfully explains how the examples are used in the subsection
|
3.0 pts
Marginal
Limited success in identifying the claims in subsections and/or explaining the uses made of the illustrative examples
|
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify the claims in the subsections and/or provides inadequate explanation of the uses made of illustrative examples.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Applying your own lens
Ability to synthesize and analyze chapter content in relation to other knowledge.
|
|
3.0 pts
Good
Clearly identified an element of the chapter and intelligently demonstrates its links to other knowledge that the student has gained
|
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to synthesize his/her learning
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion
Poses clarifying substantial questions of the text
|
|
3.0 pts
Good
Questions demonstrate careful consideration of the content of the chapter content and concepts.
|
2.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Questions are poorly articulated or do not demonstrate substantive engagement with the content and concepts of the chapter
|
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No questions were asked
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 13.0
|
Related Items
Horaceyim
