Developmental Aspects of Grief Essay
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3 Satisfactory 79.00% |
4 Good 5 Excellent 100% 87.00% |
||
|
Content 70% |
|
|||||
|
In an essay of (750-1,000 words), address the following: Describe major factors unique in each group- (Factors such as: traditions, attitudes toward death, practices, encounters with dying, death, and bereavement.) |
Essay omits or incompletely describes major factors unique in each group. |
Essay inadequately describes major factors unique in each group. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes major factors unique in each group. Description is limited. |
Essay clearly describes major factors unique in each group. Description is strong, showing sound analysis. |
Essay expertly describes major factors unique in each group. Description is comprehensive and insightful. |
|
|
20.0 %Describe major factors that were similar for the groups. |
Essay omits or incompletely describes major factors that were similar for the groups. |
Essay inadequately describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. |
Essay clearly describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims. |
Essay expertly describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. |
|
|
20.0 %Describe how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. |
Essay omits or incompletely describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. |
Essay inadequately describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. |
Essay clearly describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims. |
Essay expertly describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. |
|
|
20.0 %Organization & Effectiveness |
|
|||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
10.0 %Format |
|
|||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
|
|