LASA 2—Presentation of Strategy Audit Findings

Criteria Unsatisfactory Emerging Proficient Exemplary

Content Knowledge:

Application Component 1

Communicates the ability to

summarize the significant

findings of your analyses. A

concise and insightful

summary of the significant

findings of your analysis

findings and the

recommendations you have

for your exe

Response exhibits substantial

gaps in knowledge of the

disciplinary content knowledge.

Response provides a minimal

explanation of the specific issue

within the context of the topic

area.

Response fails to provide

supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps

in knowledge of the disciplinary

content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue

superficially within the context of the

topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within

the discipline.

Response is supported by current

literature, but is not consistently

done.

Response demonstrates a working

command of the disciplinary content

knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue

within the context of the topic area using

relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and their relevance to real

world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by

current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary

understanding of the disciplinary

content.

Response provides an in-depth

discussion of the specific issue within

the context of the topic area using

relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and provides insightful

recommendations related to real world

contexts.

Response is supported by current and

relevant literature based on sound

theories and best practices leading to

effective conclusions.

Content Knowledge:

Application Component 2

Communicates the ability to

identify the most important

Strategic Issues facing your

business unit. CO 1,4 PO

1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3,

4.1, 4.2 ILO 1, 3, 5, 6

Response exhibits substantial

gaps in knowledge of the

disciplinary content knowledge;

Response provides a minimal

explanation of the specific issue

within the context of the topic

area

Response fails to provide

supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps

in knowledge of the disciplinary

content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue

superficially within the context of the

topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within

the discipline.

Response is supported by current

literature, but is not consistently

done.

Response demonstrates a working

command of the disciplinary content

knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue

within the context of the topic area using

relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and their relevance to real

world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by

current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary

understanding of the disciplinary

content.

Response provides an in-depth

discussion of the specific issue within

the context of the topic area using

relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and provides insightful

recommendations related to real world

contexts.

Response is supported by current and

relevant literature based on sound

theories and best practices leading to

effective conclusions.

Content Knowledge:

Application Component 3

Communicates the ability to

represent all misalignments

found in the following

categories: • Product

portfolio • Structure •

Organizational

culture/behavior • Value

chain actions • Performance

measures CO 2,3 PO

Response exhibits substantial

gaps in knowledge of the

disciplinary content knowledge;

Response provides a minimal

explanation of the specific issue

within the context of the topic

area

Response fails to provide

supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps

in knowledge of the disciplinary

content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue

superficially within the context of the

topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within

the discipline.

Response is supported by current

literature, but is not consistently

done.

Response demonstrates a working

command of the disciplinary content

knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue

within the context of the topic area using

relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and their relevance to real

world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by

current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary

understanding of the disciplinary

content.

Response provides an in-depth

discussion of the specific issue within

the context of the topic area using

relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and provides insightful

recommendations related to real world

contexts.

Response is supported by current and

relevant literature based on sound

theories and best practices leading to

effective conclusions.

Content Knowledge:

Application Component 4

Communicates the ability to

provide recommendations

for a Strategic Issue and

explain how it will resolve

the issue. CO 1, 2, 3 PO

1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3,

3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4.3 ILO 1, 3, 6

Response exhibits substantial

gaps in knowledge of the

disciplinary content knowledge;

Response provides a minimal

explanation of the specific issue

within the context of the topic

area

Response fails to provide

supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps

in knowledge of the disciplinary

content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue

superficially within the context of the

topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within

the discipline.

Response is supported by current

literature, but is not consistently

done.

Response demonstrates a working

command of the disciplinary content

knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue

within the context of the topic area using

relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and their relevance to real

world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by

current and relevant literature

Response demonstrates an exemplary

understanding of the disciplinary

content.

Response provides an in-depth

discussion of the specific issue within

the context of the topic area using

relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and provides insightful

recommendations related to real world

contexts.

Response is supported by current and

relevant literature based on sound

theories and best practices leading to

effective conclusions.

Content Knowledge:

Application Component 5

Communicates the ability to

provide an Executive

Summary and

Recommendations,

Synthesis and Presentation

CO 1, 2, 3 PO 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,

2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,

4.3 ILO 1, 3, 6

Response exhibits substantial

gaps in knowledge of the

disciplinary content knowledge;

Response provides a minimal

explanation of the specific issue

within the context of the topic

area

Response fails to provide

supporting details or examples.

Response exhibits some gaps

in knowledge of the disciplinary

content knowledge.

Response discusses the specific issue

superficially within the context of the

topic area using a few details.

Response relates the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within

the discipline.

Response is supported by current

literature, but is not consistently

done.

Response demonstrates a working

command of the disciplinary content

knowledge.

Response examines the specific issue

within the context of the topic area using

relevant details and examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and their relevance to real

world contexts.

Response is adequately supported by

current and relevant literature.

Response demonstrates an exemplary

understanding of the disciplinary

content.

Response provides an in-depth

discussion of the specific issue within

the context of the topic area using

relevant details and numerous examples.

Response analyzes the specific aspect of

the issue to applicable areas within the

discipline and provides insightful

recommendations related to real world

contexts.

Response is supported by current and

relevant literature based on sound

theories and best practices leading to

effective conclusions.

Written

Communication/Personal

Effectiveness Conveys

through written word

understanding and

application of an Executive

Summary, Strategic Issues

recommendations, SWOT

analysis, Balanced

Scorecard, Organizational

Assessment, External

Environment Scan, Mar

Writing is disorganized; lacks

appropriate APA style and

format;

Writing is unclear and includes

major grammatical and usage

errors.

Writing shows some gaps with respect

to organization and rhetoric; has

some errors with respect to APA style

and format;

Writing is somewhat clear and

includes some major grammatical or

usage errors.

Writing is concise and clear in content,

language use, grammar, organization,

and sentence structure;

Writing is free of major grammatical and

usage errors.

Writing is professional and scholarly,

reflecting mastery of content, language

use, grammar, organization, and

sentence structure;

Writing is cohesive, convincing, and well

composed.

Oral

Communication/Personal

Effectiveness Conveys

through oral

communication

understanding and

application of 10-slide

Power Point Presentation.

Presentation is disorganized or

lacks coherent flow;

Content is unclear; lacks proper

articulation of key points.

Presentation shows some gaps with

respect to organization and rhetoric of

presentation;

Content lacks clarity; includes

fragmented but emerging articulation

of key points.

Presentation is concise with a logical

flow of thought;

Content includes clearly articulated key

points that are free of major errors.

Presentation is persuasive, and well-

presented with a good blend of content

and graphics

Content includes well-made key points

that represent a clear understanding.

Selection of slide design is appropriate

for the topic, follows key elements of

CO 1 PO 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3,

3.3 ILO 1, 3, 6

Presentation is visually appealing and

addresses audience considerations

adequately.

visual aesthetics, and is well tailored to

meet audience needs.

Overall Score Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4