milestone 4 (revisited)
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Methods: Participants
Outlines the participants in the study and how they were recruited
(100%)
Outlines the participants in the study, but does not explain how they were recruited
(70%)
Does not outline the participants in the study
(0%)
15
Methods: Materials
Meets “Proficient” criteria and describes materials that are especially well aligned to the research question
(100%)
Describes the materials created for the study and how they specifically address the research question and audience
(90%)
Describes the materials created for the study, but does not describe how they specifically address the research question or audience, or description has gaps in accuracy or detail
(70%)
Does not describe the materials created for the study and how they specifically address the research question and audience (0%)
15
Methods: Methodological Procedures
Meets “Proficient” criteria and describes procedures that are especially well aligned to the research question
(100%)
Describes the methodological procedures used to collect data and how the materials were used in collecting
(90%)
Describes the methodological procedures used to collect data, but not how the materials were used in collecting, or description has gaps in accuracy or detail (70%)
Does not describe the methodological procedures used to collect data and how the materials were used in collecting (0%)
15
Results: Raw Data
Meets “Proficient” criteria and is exceptionally clear, contextualized, and aligned to the research question
(100%)
Describes how the raw data was reduced for statistical analysis, clearly detailing each step of the process
(90%)
Describes how the raw data was reduced for statistical analysis, but does not clearly detail each step of the process, or steps are inappropriate
(70%)
Does not describe how the raw data was reduced for statistical analysis
(0%)
10
Results: Descriptive
Creates a table outlining the
Creates a table outlining the
Does not create a table outlining
10
Statistics
descriptive statistics for the key variables
(100%)
descriptive statistics for the key variables, with gaps in accuracy or detail
(70%)
the descriptive statistics for the key variables
(0%)
Results: Statistical Test
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding the alignment between appropriate statistical tests and data
(100%)
Describes the statistical test selected and explains why the test is the most appropriate for analyzing the data
(90%)
Describes the statistical test selected, but does not explain why the test is the most appropriate for analyzing the data, or explanation lacks detail or accuracy
(70%)
Does not describe the statistical test selected
(0%)
15
Results: Manuscript Standards
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and manuscript is of the quality that would be found in an American Psychological Association article (100%)
Manuscript is of professional quality, as outlined by the American Psychological Association’s standards (90%)
Manuscript is aligned with the American Psychological Association’s standards, but not of professional quality
(70%)
Manuscript is not aligned with the American Psychological Association’s standards
(0%)
15
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
(100%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (90%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
(70%)
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
(0%)
5
Earned Total