|
Format / Layout
30%
|
Paper is difficult to read because of grammatical errors. There are many spelling errors. The flow/ sequence of the paper is illogical, confusing and distracting.
|
The paper is understandable. There are some errors but they do not take away from the content. The flow/sequence of the paper makes sense.
|
The paper is well organized, demonstrates logical sequencing and is easy to read with zero spelling or grammar errors. The flow works well with the content.
|
|
Reading Critically
(Summary)
20%
|
Large sections or paragraphs are paraphrased from article or web with only a few words changed.
Some text seems familiar! Changing words does not make it OK
Sentences are copied from article or web with only a few words changed.
The author does not seem to understand and/or interpret key concepts.
|
The paper demonstrates the writer summarizing in their own words.
The author does seem to understand and/or interpret some key concepts. However, some key concepts are missing.
|
The writer was able to articulate in their own words major concepts from their perspective, perhaps sharing their experience.
Provides the reader with a condensed and objective account of the main ideas and features of the text.
The paper demonstrates an understanding of key concepts and persuades others to accept or acknowledge new ideas.
Citations when quotations are more appropriate
|
|
Conclusion
10%
|
No conclusion or conclusion does not contain an example related to the topic.
|
The conclusion provides an applied example.
|
The conclusion includes an engaging applied example that relates to a part of the summary.
|
|
Your Learning Experience
10%
|
I did not learn anything from this paper. Nothing original was being said.
|
I learned something from reading this paper. I felt that the author added to the facts.
|
I want to learn more about the topic of the paper. I felt engaged throughout reading it.
|
Ramgowtham
rubricinstructions.docx
0
