job 2

Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

Does not describe environmental and epidemiological data about a community.

Describes environmental and epidemiological data about a community in an incomplete manner, leading to a flawed diagnosis of a population-focused priority for care.

Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care. Support you evaluation with specific reference to professional best-practices or scholarly sources.

Develop an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

Does not describe an ethical health improvement plan.

Describes an ethical health improvement plan. However, the description is either missing the outcome criteria or the criteria are not relevant to population health priority for care identified or described health improvement plan.

Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health issue identified in the evaluation. Specifically notes environmental realities and challenges existing in the community, potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community, and why proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Specifically notes environmental realities and challenges existing in the community, potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community, and why proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.

Explain a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Does not explain a strategy for communicating with community stakeholders and community members in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Explains a communication strategy that falls short of being ethical, culturally sensitive, or inclusive.

Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Notes specific strategies to allow for a respectful exchange of ideas and insights with the community organization. Specifically notes relevant community stakeholders, relevant, how communication will be mindful of data privacy and help make complex medical terms understandable to community members regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Explain the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan

Does not explain the value and relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Provides a weak or flawed explanation of the value or relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan. Supports the explanation with reference to specific professional best- practices and scholarly sources.

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change.

Does not communicate the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan.

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional manner. The communication is unclear or disorganized, which limits the engagement of community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

Communicates the Evidence- Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change. Provides specific actions that the community stakeholders can take themselves to help provide a feeling of community ownership in the plan.

Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Does not integrate credible sources of evidence or apply APA formatting to in- text citations and references.

Integrates credible sources of evidence, but the sources used is not relevant or do not well support assertions. APA formatting of in-text citations and references is incorrect or inconsistent, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA style of in-text citations and references.