Prac 5
Herealshi
Rubricforwk5assgn.docx
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
14 (70%) - 15 (75%) Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence-based resources.
12 (60%) - 13 (65%) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence-based resources.
10 (50%) - 11 (55%) Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
,br>Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources but they may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%) - 9 (45%) Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
,br>Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) - 1 (5%) Poor
No purpose statement was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
0 (0%) - 1 (5%) Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and
work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%)
-
15 (75%)
Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment inc
ludes superior support of the approach with significant evidence
-
based resources.
12 (60%)
-
13 (65%
) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence
-
based resources.
10 (50%)
-
11 (55%)
Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
,br>Assignment may include addit
ional support of the approach with evidence
-
based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%)
-
9 (45%)
Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately
addressed.
,br>Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence
-
based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%)
-
2.5 (12.5%)
Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided w
hich delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%)
-
2 (10%)
Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%)
-
1.5 (7.5%)
Fair
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%) - 15 (75%) Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence-based resources.
12 (60%) - 13 (65%) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence-based resources.
10 (50%) - 11 (55%) Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
,br>Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%) - 9 (45%) Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
,br>Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
