Art History
Rubric for Unit 5 Written Assignment
|
CRITERIA |
Deficient (0-5points) |
Proficient to Development Needed (6-8 points) |
Exemplary to Proficient (9-10 points) |
Points Earned (100 points) |
|
Overview of the topic. 25 points |
Does not provide an adequate overview or is missing |
Overview is presented, though may not be clear or complete |
Overview is clearly presented including all criteria outlined above |
|
|
Interpretation 25 points |
Missing major content areas, unable to compare content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Recognizes basic content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Critiques content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
|
|
Evaluation 25 points |
Fails to draw conclusions between content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Identifies some conclusions between content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Examines conclusions between content from Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
|
|
Presentation 10 points |
Misrepresents issues or draws faulty conclusions |
Identifies or generalizes issues |
Discusses issues thoroughly and shows intellectual honesty |
|
|
Evidence of learning outcomes 15 points |
Unclear or contradictory evidence of learning the styles of Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Some evidence of learning the styles of Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
Complete evidence of learning all about Neoclassicism and Romanticism |
|
Rubric for Unit 5
Written Assignment
The artistic styles of Neoclassicism and Romanticism seem to be at polar opposites with each other for many reasons. The bes
t example of their differences is in the artwork of one artist: Jacques
-
Louis David. David is
classified as the epitome of Neoclas
sical art. However, his painting The Death of Marat is undeniably an example of Romanticism. Your task is to compare and co
ntrast the Romantic style of
Jacques
-
Louis David
’s The
Death of Marat with another of
Jacques
-
Louis David
’s Neoclassical paintings of your choice
. Historical data is not necessary for this essay: this is another “tell me what you see” critique, using the knowledge you
have
acquired in deciphering artwork
in this class.
CRITERIA
Deficient
(0
-
5points)
Proficient to
Development
Needed
(6
-
8 points)
Exemplary to Proficient
(9
-
10 points)
Points
Earned
(100
points)
Overview of
the topic.
25 points
Does not provide an
adequate overview
or is missing
Overview
is
presented, though
may not be clear or
complete
Overview is clearly
presented including all
criteria outlined above
Interpretation
25 points
Missing major
content areas
, unable
to compare content
from
Neoclassicism
and Romanticism
Recognizes basic
content
from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Critiques content
from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Evaluation
25 points
Fails to draw
conclusions
between
content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Identifies some
conclusions
between
content from
Neoclassici
sm and
Romanticism
Examines conclusions
between content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Presentation
10 points
Misrepresents issues
or draws faulty
conclusions
Identifies or
generalizes issues
Discusses issues
thoroughly and shows
intellectual honesty
Evidence of
learning
outcomes
15 points
Unclear or
contradictory
evidence of
learning
the styles of
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Some
evidence of
learning the styles of
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Complete evi
dence of
learning all about
Neoclassicism
and
Romanticism
Rubric for Unit 5 Written Assignment
The artistic styles of Neoclassicism and Romanticism seem to be at polar opposites with each other for many reasons. The best example of their differences is in the artwork of one artist: Jacques-Louis David. David is
classified as the epitome of Neoclassical art. However, his painting The Death of Marat is undeniably an example of Romanticism. Your task is to compare and contrast the Romantic style of Jacques-Louis David’s The
Death of Marat with another of Jacques-Louis David’s Neoclassical paintings of your choice. Historical data is not necessary for this essay: this is another “tell me what you see” critique, using the knowledge you have
acquired in deciphering artwork in this class.
CRITERIA Deficient
(0-5points)
Proficient to
Development
Needed
(6-8 points)
Exemplary to Proficient
(9-10 points)
Points
Earned
(100
points)
Overview of
the topic.
25 points
Does not provide an
adequate overview
or is missing
Overview is
presented, though
may not be clear or
complete
Overview is clearly
presented including all
criteria outlined above
Interpretation
25 points
Missing major
content areas, unable
to compare content
from Neoclassicism
and Romanticism
Recognizes basic
content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Critiques content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Evaluation
25 points
Fails to draw
conclusions between
content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Identifies some
conclusions between
content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Examines conclusions
between content from
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Presentation
10 points
Misrepresents issues
or draws faulty
conclusions
Identifies or
generalizes issues
Discusses issues
thoroughly and shows
intellectual honesty
Evidence of
learning
outcomes
15 points
Unclear or
contradictory
evidence of learning
the styles of
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Some evidence of
learning the styles of
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism
Complete evidence of
learning all about
Neoclassicism and
Romanticism