home work
|
|
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education University of Hail College of Nursing |
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض |
|
|
Theoretical Foundation for Nursing (NURS 501) Rubric for Theory Critique – Written Assignment |
|
Assessment Task |
Assessment Score |
|
|
□ |
Rubric for Theory Critique – Written Assignment |
20% |
|
Student Name: |
|
|
Student ID: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|
Theory: |
|
|
Overall Grade: |
/ |
Assessment Rubric:
|
ITEM |
POOR (0) |
ACCEPTABLE (1) |
IDEAL (2) |
CLO |
STUDENT’S GRADE |
|
1) Goal or purpose of the theory as a baseline for theory critique |
No discussion of the goal or purpose of the theory. |
The aim and intent of the theory was moderately discussed. |
The aim, the intent and the reason why the theory was developed were comprehensively discussed |
2.3 |
|
|
2) Structural Components of the theory as baseline for the critique |
None of the structural components of the theory was discussed |
Assumptions and concepts of the theory were discussed |
Assumptions, concepts and propositions of the theory were discussed |
2.4 |
|
|
3) Functional Components of the theory as a baseline for the critique |
None of the functional components of the theory was discussed |
Focus of the theory was discussed |
Focus of the theory and definitions (i.e., client, nursing, health, etc.) were discussed |
2.5 |
|
|
4) Relationship between Structure and function |
Relationship between structure and function was not discussed |
Discussion was limited to clarity and consistency |
Discussion included clarity, consistency, simplicity/complexity and tautology/teleology |
2.4 |
|
|
5) Diagram of Theory |
No diagram of the theory was included |
Visual or graphic presentation of the theory was included |
Visual or graphic presentation of theory was included with a discussion regarding its clarity and logical representation |
2.4 |
|
|
6) Circle of Contagiousness |
No discussion regarding how the theory was adopted by others. |
A discussion of the geographical location of adoption of the theory by others was included |
A discussion of the geographical location of adoption of the theory by others with examples of specific types of institutions were included |
2.1 |
|
|
7) Usefulness |
No discussion of usefulness of the theory relative to the four areas of nursing (practice, education, research, administration) |
Discussed the usefulness of the theory in terms of two areas of nursing |
Discussed the usefulness of the theory in terms of three or four areas of nursing |
2.1 |
|
|
8) External Components |
No discussion of external components of the theory was included. |
A discussion of personal and professional values was included |
A comprehensive discussion of personal, professional, social values and social significance was included. |
2.3 |
|
|
9) Reference List |
Provided an insufficient number of references for the theory critique assignment. |
Provided a reasonably sufficient number of references for the theory critique. |
Provided an extensive number of references for the theory critique. |
Not applicable |
|
|
10) APA Formatting |
APA conventions for citing in-text and on the reference list were not followed |
APA conventions for citing in-text and on the reference list were somewhat followed. |
APA conventions for citing in-text and on the reference list were consistently followed. |
Not applicable |
|
|
TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 20 |
|
Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________
Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________
Page 1 of 2
|
|
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017 |
|
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018 |