Theoretical Analysis Paper and presentation
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory 0 |
Developing 2 |
Satisfactory 3 |
Excellent 4 |
Score |
|
Context of the Theory |
Theory is not specified or definition of theory is directly (copied) replicated from the source. |
Theory is broadly defined and refers to theorists who developed the term and its purpose. |
Theory is defined in the writer’s own words. Writer identifies theorists who developed the theory and its purpose. |
Theory is defined in the writer’s own words. Writer identifies theorists who developed the theory and when, its purpose in multiple disciplines. |
|
|
Applications of Theory |
No evidence provided on theory being applied to settings in education and beyond the school context |
One to two theoretical applications are broadly mentioned for the PK-12 curriculum content or instructional practice. |
Three theoretical applications are mentioned in details for the PK-12 content curriculum, teacher’s instructional practice, and in students’ communities/outside of the classroom context. The writer cites scholars that support their claims. |
Four or more applications are mentioned in details for PK-12 content, teacher’s instructional delivery/practice, and in students’ communities/beyond the classroom context. The writer cites scholars that support their claims. Applications also address future work that is needed for the theory. |
|
|
Comparison of Theories |
No evidence provided on comparing a specific theory with another theory. |
Comparison of theory only identifies and explains 1 theory and theorist and how the theory is similar or different. |
Comparison of theory identifies and explains how the given theory is similar and different from the other theory purpose and application. The writer cites scholars that support their claims.
|
Comparison of theory identifies and explains how the given theory is similar and different from the other theory purpose and application. The writer explains how the two theorists would view a contemporary issue differently or in through a similar perspective. The writer cites scholars that support their claims. |
|
|
Empowerment/ Disempowerment of the Theory for Targeted Communities |
No evidence provided on explaining how the theory empowers or disempowered a specific community. |
Paper states how the theory empowers or disempowers a specific community. |
Paper states how the theory empowers and disempowers specific communities. |
Paper states how the theory initially disempowered specific communities and how it has evolved to empower specific communities. |
|
|
Argument of Theory |
No evidence provided on explaining the argument, and personal use of the theory. |
The paper provides explanation on the importance of using the theory. |
The paper includes details for only supporting the theory by identifying how the writer intends to apply it. |
The paper includes details for supporting the theory, explanation on applying it, and its limitations of the theory are clearly defined. |
|
|
Application of Selected Theory to Your Purpose as an Educator |
No evidence provided on how the selected theory identifies their role in the classroom and connection with classroom practices |
Minimal evidence with no scholarly support that addresses how the selected theory identifies their role in the classroom. |
Evidence that addresses how the selected theory identifies your purpose of teaching, how you should teach, and why. |
Evidence with scholarly support that addresses how the selected theory identifies your purpose of teaching, how you should teach, why it is most effective for the most marginalized communities. |
|
|
Organization/ Structure of Paper |
No evidence of organization/structure on the paper. |
Parts of the paper show organization but remain difficult for the reader to follow. |
The body of the paper is organized through the identification of a thesis, use of transitional words, headings and sub-headings. |
The body of the paper is organized through the identification of a thesis, use of transitional words, headings, sub-headings, and closing. |
|
|
APA 7th Edition Format |
None of the elements of the paper adhere to the APA 7th edition format. |
Few of the citations, headings, and reference page in the paper follow the APA 7th edition format. |
Most of the citations, headings, and reference page in the paper follow the APA 7th edition format. |
All citations, headings, and reference page in the paper follow the APA 7th edition format. |
|
|
Mechanics of Writing |
Five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Three to four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Only 1-2 Grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors are found on the paper. Transitional phrases are presented in the paper. |
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors are very non-existent (>1). Transitional phrases are used to support the coherence and structure of the paper. |
|
|
Presentation |
The volume is so low or the rate is so fast that you cannot understand most of the message. The content is primarily irrelevant. |
The volume level is appropriate. However, the speaker includes some irrelevant content. The speaker wanders off the topic. |
The speaker focuses primarily on relevant content. The speaker sticks to the topic. The speaker adapts the content in a general way to the listener and the situation. The speaker uses creativity to deliver the main idea of the content. The speaker exceeds over 1-2 minute for the time of the presentation |
The speaker focuses primarily on relevant content. The speaker sticks to the topic. The speaker adapts the content in a general way to the listener and the situation. The speaker uses creativity to deliver the main idea of the content. The speaker does not exceed the time for the presentation. |
|
Deduction of 5 points for submitting assignment via email (regardless of the situation/circumstance).
Total_____/38 points