Stakeholder Analysis Paper: Mini-Case Analysis #1
Rubric for Stakeholder Analysis (10%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory = 0-1 / Satisfactory = 2 / Excellent = 3 |
||||
|
|
Level 0 = 0pts. |
Level 1 = 1pt. |
Level 2 = 2pts. |
Level 3 = 3pts. |
Total |
|
Identifies Stakeholders |
Identification of relevant stakeholders is sparse or missing. |
Identifies some of the relevant stakeholders in a given problem/case. Some important stakeholders are missing. |
Identifies most of the relevant stakeholders in a given problem/case. Most important stakeholders are identified. |
Completely and thoughtfully identifies all relevant and important stakeholders in a given problem/case. |
|
|
Supports Arguments |
Inconsistent or lacking in articulation of why identified stakeholders are relevant to the problem. |
Some important points are missing and/or support for inclusion of stakeholders lacks substantial explanation. |
Able to support inclusion of stakeholders with adequate explanation and few logical fallacies. |
Able to support inclusion of stakeholders with a substantial amount of explanation and no logical fallacies. |
|
|
Integrates Course Concepts |
Very few course concepts integrated. |
Integrates some course concepts, however, with some inaccuracies. |
Integrates course concepts fairly well, with few inaccuracies. |
Integrates course concepts consistently and accurately. |
|
|
Connects Analysis to Recommended Actions |
Analysis doesn’t inform or lead to recommended actions. |
Analysis somewhat informs recommended actions, but linkages are not always clear. |
Analysis directly informs and leads to recommended actions. |
|
|
|
Structure & Language |
Errors are so numerous that they obscure meaning. |
Occasional errors in writing, but they don’t represent a major distraction. |
Writing is free or almost free of errors. |
|
|
|
|
Total Score (Possible 15) |
|