|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
“B/C” Range Goals
|
“A” Range Goals
|
|
Cover Page and Title
Weight 5%
|
Title shows evidence of originality and creativity. Cover page is properly formatted.
|
Title is extremely creative, original, and thought-provoking – it sounds like the title of a professional article.
|
|
Abstract
Weight 15%
|
Abstract effectively defines an area of interest, summarizes research problem, and captures readers’ interest by providing thought-provoking background information, contextualizing, facts, examples, quotes, and/or statistics, while remaining concise.
|
The abstract does a masterful job of using dazzling language and attention-grabbing examples to hook the reader into wanting to read further about a clearly defined research problem.
|
|
Significance of the Problem
Weight 25%
|
The significance of the problem has been discussed and the importance of research on that has been identified.
|
The writer goes beyond the simple identification of the problem significance, and tries to go in-depth with different dimensions of the issue with a critical perspective while acknowledging competing narratives on the issue.
|
|
Question and Thesis
Weight 15%
|
The question and thesis do not reflect the author’s effort to think outside the box, and his/her effort in learning about various dimensions of the question at hand.
|
The question asked is sharp and demonstrates the author’s genuine care for fixing the identified problem/ The thesis is strong, clear, and indicative of the student’s willingness to take risk and prior effort to understand the complexity of the issue at hand.
|
|
Sources and Research Methods
Weight 10%
|
Description of research methods effectively demonstrates logical plan for gathering sources, including at least one primary source.
|
Section showcases exceptional research plan that goes into more detail than that of the typical proposal.
|
|
Document Design
Weight 10%
|
Document employs effective use of design that is both visually appealing and genre-appropriate. Single-spacing, clear headings, bolding, font sizes, etc., make this proposal easy to read for audiences with limited time for reviewing the proposal. There is a well-organized works cited page at the end.
|
Project not only fulfills the basic requirements of visual design; it looks downright eye-catching and professional.
|
|
Professionalism and Language
Weight 20%
|
Draft shows effective and appropriate use of syntax, vocabulary, punctuation, and spelling in service of rhetorical purpose.
|
Language, in addition to being nearly error-free, is exceptionally dazzling. Sophisticated vocabulary, and / or stellar command of sentence structure make the reading of this project extremely engaging.
|