Article Selection
5.0 %
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %
Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %
Design.
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %
Setting or Sample
Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %
Methods: Intervention or Instruments
Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Analysis
Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Key Findings
Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Recommendations
Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone
.
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %
Presentation
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
10.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error
ravinder0786
RubricforLiteratureReviewTable.docx
0
