communication

10.0 pts

Full Marks

(9-10 Points) Essay presents a clearly defined central idea; skillful implementation of organizational pattern enhances cohesion of paper

8.0 pts

Above Average

(7-8 points)Essay presents a central idea; organizational pattern makes the content

6.0 pts

Average

(5-6 points) Essay presents a central idea but aspects are unfocused;

4.0 pts

Below Average

(3-4 Points) Essay attempts a central idea; organizational pattern has gaps in logic that make paper confusing

2.0 pts

Minimal

(1-2 points) Essay central idea is mininal development and is unfocused and rambling; organizational pattern lacks logical connection among arguments

25.0 pts

Full Marks

(23-25 points) Through development of content; Clearly articulates all aspects of phases of group development theory required of assignment in a well-developed manner

22.0 pts

Above Average

(20-22 points) Above adequate development of content; Clearly articulates all aspects of phases of group development theory required of the assignment

19.0 pts

Average

(17-19 points) Adequate development of content; Articulation of phases of group development theory is brief and underdeveloped at times

16.0 pts

Below Average

(14-16 points) Partial development of content; some aspects of phases of group development theory are unclear

13.0 pts

Minimal

(11-13 points) minimal development of content; Articulation of phases of group development theory is confusing or incorrectly explained

25.0 pts

Full Marks

(23-25 points) Through development of analysis; Clearly articulates examples that demonstrate all aspects of phases of group development theory required of assignment in a well-developed manner

22.0 pts

Above Average

(20-22 points) Above adequate development of analysis; Clearly articulates examples that demonstrate all aspects of phases of group development theory required of assignment

19.0 pts

Average

(17-19 points) Adequate development of analysis; Some examples are unclear and/or examples demonstrate a limited understanding of phases of group development theory

16.0 pts

Below Average

(14-16 points) Partial development of analysis; Some examples are unclear and/or examples demonstrate a limited understanding of phases of group development theory

13.0 pts

Minimal

(11-13 points) Minimal development of analysis; Articulation of examples as related to phases of group development theory is confusing or incorrectly explained

20.0 pts

Full Marks

(19-20 points) Internal documentation used appropriately to summarize research on theory; research appropriately documents claims; 3 academic sources included

18.0 pts

Above Average

(17-18 points) Internal documentation used to summarize research on theory; research documents most claims; 3 sources included but only 1 or 2 are academic sources

16.0 pts

Average

(15-16 points) Student uses internal documentation, but validity of documentation is somewhat questionable; over-reliant on a small number of articles; 3 sources sources included but none of them are academic sources (or 1/2 academic reviewed with book)

14.0 pts

Below Average

(13-14 points) Numerous claims unsupported by research; validity of documentation is questionable; over-reliant on a small number of articles to support the developing argument; 3 sources included but 1 of 3 is book and none are academic sources

12.0 pts

Minimal

(11-12 points) Essay riddled with unsupported claims; internal textual citations are sloppy; evidence that author is simply adding citations to give appearance of documenting claims OR relying on just textbook as basis for argument; only 1 or 2 sources or course textbook only

20.0 pts

Full Marks

(19-20 points) Mastery of application of standard rules of English; limited writing rules violations, however, these do not detract from cohesion and readability of pape

18.0 pts

Above Average

(17-18 points) Above average application of standard rules of English; some writing rules violations that have minimal detraction from cohesion and readability of paper

16.0 pts

Average

(15-16 points) Average application of standard rules of English; writing rules violations detract at times from cohesion and readability of paper

14.0 pts

Below Average

(13-14 points) Acceptable application of standard rules of English; multiple writing rules violations detract at times from cohesion and readability of paper

11.0 pts

Minimal

(11-12 points) Minimal application of standard rules of English; multiple writing rules violations make paper confusing and the readability of the paper is minimal