ANSWER QUESTION
Rubric for Grading of Case Study and Think Like a Scientist Posts
|
|
Excellent |
Fair |
Needs Work |
Unacceptable |
|
Synthesis |
Incorporates at least TWO concepts from the course with an indication of where they come from (book, lectures, activities, etc.) |
Incorporates at least TWO concepts from the course WITHOUT an indication of where they come from (book, lectures, activities, etc.) |
Incorporates ONE concept from the course (book, lectures, activities, etc.) |
The post does not include ideas from the course. |
|
Reasoning & Evidence
(see “Good Evidence, Bad Evidence” paper) |
The factual evidence and/or testimonies presented are ALL sufficient, relevant, and accurate. |
The factual evidence and/or testimonies presented are MOSTLY sufficient, relevant, and accurate. |
The factual evidence and/or testimonies presented are INFREQUENTLY sufficient, relevant, and accurate. |
Missing evidence |
|
Formatting
(see “Tips for writing posts” paper) |
The post is ordered (easy to read), with no misspellings or grammatical errors, promotes discussion, turned in on time and is respectful. |
Lacks ONE of the Excellent characteristics. |
Lacks TWO of the Excellent characteristics. |
Lacks more than TWO of the Excellent characteristics or is missing |