HRDE instructional learning
Rubric for Grading Final Instructional Module
|
Topic |
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Excellent |
|
Pre work; 10 Points Identification of learner characteristics, |
No specifications of learner characteristics |
Learner characteristics were identified for the group of learners in CAST engineering the training module is designed for |
Learner characteristics are clearly articulated for the appropriate learner group within CSAST Engineering the training will be used for |
|
Research into training topic |
No research into the training topic conducted |
Research into the topic to ensure the latest techniques, standards are included in the training topic- evidenced by citations |
Extensive research to support the training strategy for this particular topic |
|
Task analysis/ topic analysis |
Should have included a task/topic analysis and did not |
As appropriate a detailed task analysis /topic analysis completed for specific tasks to be taught |
Task analysis and topic analysis complete and supports instructional module to teach a new task |
|
Instructional Design; 10 points Instructional Objectives
|
Incomplete instructional objectives provided |
Instructional objectives included for the training which specify behavior, conditions and criteria for evaluation |
Instructional objectives complete and used to design the training module |
|
Instructional Strategy |
No instructional strategy delineated |
Instructional Strategy delineated using generative classifications for teaching facts, concepts, principles/rules and procedures , interpersonal skills, attitudes |
Instructional strategy for teaching objectives is delineated with detail of the generative strategy used to guide the design of instruction |
|
Evaluation of Instructional strategy |
No evaluation of learning inserted into instruction, no formative evaluation of learning for a module within the training. |
Evaluation built into module to determine learning that has occurred throughout the module. Evaluation strategy for the overall success of the training module for the learner |
Evaluation built into instruction to test learners understanding for of training and a formative evaluation of learner’s comprehension of a segment of the training module is included |
|
Training module; 14 points Design considerations for designed instruction
|
Training module material poorly presented, information did not flow, no coherent design of instruction apparent |
The training module has a clear instructional design, for Articulate training the learner could control pacing, and provides feedback to learners for correct/incorrect responses. Overall comprehensive well designed training module, easy to use, opportunity for feedback on how well module met its objective provided |
Interactive, dynamic presentation for the class and individual learners. Maximizes learning for individuals within the module |
|
Use of Articulate Software |
Capabilities of Articulate not realized |
Uses all the capabilities of the Articulate software to teach the unit of instruction |
All of Articulates capabilities are used to their maximum impact |