Formal proposal
NurseyNurse77
RubricforFormalProposal.docxRubric for Formal Proposal
100 Excellent -- Quality information with all “required elements included”. Quality denotes completeness, precision, clarity, thoroughness, significance, relevance, accuracy, exhibits full span of knowledge of a subject and specific topics are focused upon, amplified and explored.
92 Good -- All “required elements” included. Information is complete, precise, clear, thorough, significant, relevant and accurate.
84 Average -- Accurate and complete information with all “required elements” included.
77 Poor -- Information is inaccurate and/or incomplete with 1 or more required elements omitted. Needs improvement.
0 Not done -- Did not do the required elements or characteristics or submitted more than 3 days late.
|
Required Elements |
Excellent 100 |
Good 92 |
Average 84 |
Poor 77 |
Not done |
|
Content |
|||||
|
Issue: Purpose (10%) Purpose of the project-clearly stated Significance – explanation of why the project is important for your setting. Also discuss the evidence base for the strategies you are considering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue: Personal reflections (10%) · Personal reflections on why you selected this issue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities: (5 %) · Comprehensive list of actions you will need to do to accomplish the project. Include all types of activities needed to support the purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcomes: Planned (10%) · Planned outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome: Evidence Based Research (10%) · Give supportive rationale for why you choose your outcomes using scholarly references · Provide information from peer-reviewed resources that provides a detailed explanation of the desired outcomes. Also include the strategies that can be used to accomplish the outcome. Be sure to include specific, cited information from the literature supporting your discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special clinical requirements of the agency (5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed schedule/timeline (5%) Timeline is for the entire 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed schedule/timeline: Collaboration with Preceptor (5%) · Reviewed/collaborated with your preceptor prior to submitting this proposal (the preceptor agreement must be submitted with this proposal- see below) |
|
|
|
||
|
Proposed evaluative criteria (20%) · Evaluative criteria discussed · Supportive rationales discussed · Scholarly references cited to support discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication |
|||||
|
Preceptor Information and Agreement Form submitted by requested date 15%. |
|
|
|
||
|
Grammar/Syntax and References in APA format (same type of error is considered as 1 error) 5% |
0-2 errors
|
3 errors
|
4 errors
|
> 4 errors
|
|
