| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| HLT-317V | HLT-317V-O500 | Health Care Field Research Final Draft | 200.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Introduction | 5.0% | The introduction to the topic is not included. | The introduction to the topic is not complete. | The introduction to the topic is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The introduction to the topic is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The introduction to the topic is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Explanation of Scholarly Research | 10.0% | The explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession is not included. | The explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession is not complete. | The explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Ethical Considerations | 10.0% | The discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection is not included. | The discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection is not complete. | The discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Data Explanation | 15.0% | The explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting is not included. | The explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting is not complete. | The explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Evaluation of Topic | 10.0% | The evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the topic as it relates to the allied health care professional is not included. | The evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the topic as it relates to the allied health care professional is not complete. | The evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the topic of interest as it relates to the allied health care professional is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the topic of interest as it relates to the allied health care professional is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the topic of interest as it relates to the allied health care professional is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Current and Future Skills and Research Trends | 10.0% | The explanation of the current and future skills and research trends within the health care industry that influence practice standards is not included. | The explanation of the current and future skills and research trends within the health care industry that influence practice standards is not complete. | The explanation of the current and future skills and research trends within the health care industry that influence practice standards is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The explanation of the current and future skills and research trends within the health care industry that influence practice standards is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The explanation of the current and future skills and research trends within the health care industry that influence practice standards is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Article Summaries | 10.0% | The summary of the conclusions from the articles is not included. | The summary of the conclusions from the articles is not complete. | The summary of the conclusions from the articles is included, but lacks description and relevant supporting details. | The summary of the conclusions from the articles is complete, and includes relevant supporting details. | The summary of the conclusions from the articles is thorough, and includes substantial relevant supporting details. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 10.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 10.0% |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Drakejosh
Rubricforfinalresearchreport.xlsx
