Case Written Assignment

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Ministry of Education

University of Hail

College of Nursing

المملكة العربية السعودية

وزارة التعليم

جامـعـة حـائل

كلية التمريض

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment

Assessment Task

Assessment Score

□

Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment

20%

Student Name:

Student ID:

Date:

Overall Grade:

ITEM

POOR

(0.0)

ACCEPTABLE

(1.0)

IDEAL

(2.0)

CLO

STUDENT’S GRADE

1) Clarification of the ethical issue.

Did not clarify the ethical issue.

Partially clarified the ethical issue

Comprehensively clarified the ethical issue

1.1

2) Re-framing of the ethical issue as an ethical question.

Failed to re-frame the ethical issue into an ethical question.

Re-framed the ethical issue into a vague ethical question.

Re-framed the ethical issue into a clear and well-defined ethical question.

1.1

3) Utilization of practice and/or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.

Did not utilize practice and/or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.

Utilized either practice or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.

Utilized both practice and research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.

1.2 and 1.3

4) Articulation of position on the issue on the basis of personal values.

Failed to articulate position on the issue based on any personal values.

Articulated position on the issue based on a single personal value.

Articulated position on the issue based on at least two personal values.

1.2

5) Referencing of personal value position to relevant ethical principles of codes.

Did not reference personal value position to any relevant ethical principle or code.

Referenced personal value position to a single relevant ethical principle or code.

Referenced personal value position to at least two relevant ethical principles or codes.

1.2

6) Articulation of position on the issue on the basis of professional values.

Failed to articulate position on the issue based on any professional values.

Articulated position on the issue based on a single professional value.

Articulated position on the issue based on at least two professional values.

1.3

7) Referencing of professional position to relevant ethical principles of codes.

Did not reference personal value position to any relevant ethical principle or code.

Referenced personal value position to a single relevant ethical principle or code.

Referenced personal value position to at least two relevant ethical principles or codes.

1.3

8) Discussion of potential challenges for practice.

Failed to discuss any potential challenges for practice.

Discussed a single potential challenge for practice.

Discussed at least two potential challenges for practice.

2.2

9) Composition of a well-structured, and grammatically correct ethical position paper.

Composed a poorly structured ethical position paper with numerous grammatical errors.

Composed a fairly-structured ethical position paper with some grammatical errors.

Composed a well-structured ethical position paper free of grammatical errors.

Not applicable

10) Reference List

Provided up to five (5) references for the ethical position paper assignment.

Provided from six (6) to ten (10) references for the ethical position paper assignment.

Provided more than ten (10) references for the ethical position paper assignment.

Not applicable

TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 20

Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017

Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018