ETHICS 101 DB 2
ETHC 101 Discussion Board “Thread” Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Structure 15 pts. |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar 10 pts. |
9 or 10 points Post is written in paragraph form and is devoid of spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors. |
7 or 8 points Post is not written in paragraph form and/or has occasional spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors. |
1 to 6 points Post is not written in paragraph form and has numerous spelling, punctuation, and grammar problems. |
0 points Not present |
|
Turabian formatting 5 pts. |
5 points Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present and are cited using footnotes in current Turabian format. |
4 points Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but are cited otherwise than using footnotes in current Turabian format. |
1 to 3 points Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but the sources are not cited. (Note: if plagiarism is present, that requires additional corrective action.) |
0 points No direct references and/or allusions to outside resources are present. |
|
Content 35 pts. |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Word Count 15 pts. |
14 or 15 points Word count is between 500 and 600 words. |
11 to 13 points Word count exceeds 600 words. |
1 to 10 points Word count is less than 500 words. |
0 points Not present |
|
Style 10 pts. |
9 or 10 points All required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that is objective, rationally argued, and not overly emotional; major points are supported by thoughtful reasoning and good examples. |
7 or 8 points All required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that aims at objective and dispassionate rationality, even if it doesn’t perfectly achieve this goal; a sincere attempt is made to support the major points with thoughtful reasoning and good examples. |
1 to 6 points Most required components of the prompt are answered in a manner that is sometimes insufficiently objective, dispassionate, and/or logical; major points are insufficiently supported by arguments and/or examples. |
0 points The required components of the prompt are not answered. |
|
Understanding 10 pts. |
9 or 10 points Post utilizes many of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding. |
6 to 8 points Post utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding. |
1 to 5 points Post utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class but sometimes in ways that suggest that they are not correctly understood. |
0 points Post does not utilize the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class. |