| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| AMP-450V | AMP-450V-O500 | Effective Decision Making | 160.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Importance of Sound Decision Making in Health Care | 10.0% | Sound decision making and consequences of poor or uninformed decision making as a leader are not discussed. | Sound decision making and consequences of poor or uninformed decision making as a leader are only partially discussed. | Sound decision making and consequences of poor or uninformed decision making as a leader are summarized. Information or rationale is needed. | Sound decision making and consequences of poor or uninformed decision making as a leader are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity. | Sound decision making and consequences of poor or uninformed decision making as a leader are discussed. The narrative demonstrates an understanding of consequence based on choice as a leader. |
| Evidence-Based Decision Making | 15.0% | The concept of evidence-based decision making and its importance and application in health care are not discussed. | The concept of evidence-based decision making and its importance and application in health care are only partially discussed. | The concept of evidence-based decision making and its importance and application in health care are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Rationale or support is needed. | The concept of evidence-based decision making and its importance and application in health care are discussed. | The concept of evidence-based decision making and its importance and application in health care are discussed in a well-supported narrative. An understanding of the importance of evidence-based decision making as a health care leader is evident. |
| Data-Driven Decision Making | 15.0% | The concept of data-driven decision making, types of data used, and its importance to decision making as a leader in health care are not discussed. | The concept of data-driven decision making, types of data used, and its importance to decision making as a leader in health care are only partially discussed. | The concept of data-driven decision making, types of data used, and its importance to decision making as a leader in health care are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Rationale or support is needed. | The concept of data-driven decision making, types of data used, and its importance to decision making as a leader in health care are discussed. Some rationale or support is needed. | The concept of data-driven decision making, types of data used, and its importance to decision making as a leader in health care are thoroughly discussed. An understanding of the importance of data-driven-decision making as a health care leader is evident. |
| Effect of Regulatory or Organizational Guidelines on Decision Making | 15.0% | Regulatory or organizational guidelines that help shape how a leader makes decisions in health care are not discussed. | Regulatory or organizational guidelines that help shape how a leader makes decisions in health care are only partially discussed. | Regulatory or organizational guidelines that help shape how a leader makes decisions in health care are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Rationale or support is needed. | Regulatory or organizational guidelines that help shape how a leader makes decisions in health care are discussed. Some rationale or support is needed. | Regulatory or organizational guidelines that help shape how a leader makes decisions in health care are thoroughly discussed. An understanding of how regulatory or organizational guidelines influence decision making as a health care leader is evident. |
| Role of Ethics in Decision Making | 15.0% | The role of ethics in decision making as a leader is not discussed. | The role of ethics in decision making as a leader is only partially discussed. | The role of ethics in decision making as a leader is summarized. Steps for promoting ethical decision making and ways to address ethical conflicts in the decision-making process are outlined. There are inaccuracies. Rationale or support is needed. | The role of ethics in decision making as a leader is described. Steps for promoting ethical decision making and ways to address ethical conflicts in the decision-making process are discussed. Some rationale or support is needed. | The role of ethics in decision making as a leader is clearly described. Steps for promoting ethical decision making and ways to address ethical conflicts in the decision-making process are thoroughly discussed. An understanding of ethical decision making as a health care leader is evident. |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 30.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Drakejosh
Rubricforeffectivedecisionmaking.xlsx
