| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| AMP-450V | AMP-450V-O500 | Benchmark – Critical Decision-Making and Organizational Performance | 140.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% |
| Consequences of Failure to Report | 15.0% | The consequences of a failure to report are not discussed. | The consequences of a failure to report are partially outlined. | The consequences of a failure to report are summarized. | The consequences of a failure to report are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. | The consequences of a failure to report are thoroughly discussed. |
| Impact of Employee Decision | 15.0% | The impact the employee decision has on patient safety, risk for litigation, organizational quality metrics, and the workload of other hospital departments is not discussed. | A discussion on the impact the employee decision has on patient safety, risk for litigation, organizational quality metrics, and the workload of other hospital departments is incomplete. | The impact the employee decision has on patient safety, on the risk for litigation, organizational quality metrics, and on the workload of other hospital departments is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. | The impact the employee decision has on patient safety, risk for litigation, organizational quality metrics, and the workload of other hospital departments is discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy. | The impact of the employee decision has on patient safety, risk for litigation, organizational quality metrics, and the workload of other hospital departments is thoroughly discussed. |
| Addressing Employee Issue and Proposing Preventative Steps as a Manager | 12.0% | How to address the issue with the employee, and proposed steps to take that ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes, are omitted. | How to address the issue with the employee, and proposed steps to take that ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes, are only partially discussed. | How to address the issue with the employee, and proposed steps to take to ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes, are summarized. More information or rationale is needed. | How to address the issue with the employee, and proposed steps to take to ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes, are discussed. | How to address the issue with the employee, and proposed steps to take to ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes, are discussed. The discussion is well-developed and demonstrates an understanding of decision making as a leader when resolving employee dilemmas. |
| Underlying Issues Contributing to Dilemma Similar to Scenario | 13.0% | Underlying aspects or issues that may contribute to similar dilemmas are not described. | Some underlying aspects or issues that may contribute to similar dilemmas are partially presented. | Underlying aspects or issues that may contribute to similar dilemmas are outlined. More information or rationale is needed. | Underlying aspects or issues that may contribute to similar dilemmas are described. | Underlying aspects or issues that may contribute to similar dilemmas are well-considered and thoroughly described. |
| Principles of Organizational Behavior and Development Contributing to Success of Health Care Organizations (4.1) | 15.0% | Principles of organizational behavior and development that contribute to the success of a health care organization are not discussed. | Principles of organizational behavior and development that contribute to the success of a health care organization are only partially discussed. | Principles of organizational behavior and development that contribute to the success of a health care organization are summarized. A general application of the principles to the scenario is presented. More information or rationale is needed. | Principles of organizational behavior and development that contribute to the success of a health care organization are discussed. Application of principles to the scenario are discussed. | Principles of organizational behavior and development that contribute to the success of a health care organization are thoroughly discussed. Application of principles to the scenario are detailed. |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 30.0% |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Drakejosh
Rubricforcriticaldecisionmaking.xlsx
