|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
Unsatisfactory = 0-1 / Satisfactory = 2 / Excellent = 3
|
|
|
Level 0 = 0pts.
|
Level 1 = 1pt.
|
Level 2 = 2pts.
|
Level 3 = 3pts.
|
Total
|
|
Identification of Issues
|
Identification of ethical /social concerns is sparse or missing.
|
Identifies some of the ethical/social concerns. Some important points are missing.
|
Identifies most of the ethical/social concerns. Most significant points are identified.
|
Completely and thoughtfully identifies all ethical/social issues.
|
|
|
Supports Arguments
|
Inconsistent explanation of position and/or offers little or no supporting evidence.
|
Most points are supported with adequate information. Some important points are missing and/or support for positions lacks substantial explanation.
|
Able to support a position with adequate information.
|
Able to support a position with a substantial amount of information, little or no bias, and valid arguments.
|
|
|
Integration of Course Concepts
|
Almost no course concepts integrated.
|
Integrates few course concepts, however, with some inaccuracies.
|
Integrates course concepts fairly well, with few inaccuracies.
|
Integrates course concepts consistently and accurately.
|
|
|
Structure
|
Lacks thesis statement, disorganized; lacks coherent paragraphs; vague; difficult to understand.
|
Logical flow from the thesis statement but occasional confusion between ideas and organization of presentation.
|
Presentation starting with thesis statement is smooth, polished and organized; flows well.
|
|
|
Language
|
Errors in paragraph construction, grammar, and spelling are so numerous that they obscure meaning.
|
Coherent paragraphs but occasional errors in logical flow, grammar, spelling, and word usage.
|
Writing is free or almost free of errors.
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
Total Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|