health promotion concepts

Outstanding Achievement

Commendable Achievement

Acceptable Achievement

Marginal Achievement

Unacceptable Achievement

Failing

Health Topic and Community: Clearly identified health topic and community and provides justification for using the socio-ecological approach. (CLO 1 & 3)

Points:

10 (10%)

Clearly identifies the health topic and community (e.g., cultural group), and provides a comprehensive justification for using the socio-ecological approach that suggests a full understanding. Provides valid statistical information.

Points:

9 (9%)

Identifies a health topic and community (e.g., cultural group), and provides a justification for using the socio- ecological approach that suggests an adequate understanding. Health topic could have more information.

Points:

8 (8%)

Identifies a health topic and/or community (e.g., cultural group). Provides justification for using the socio-ecological approach that suggests a basic understanding. Both the health topic and community could have more information for stronger understanding.

Points:

7 (7%)

Identifies a health topic or community (e.g., cultural group). Demonstrates a basic understanding of the socio-ecological approach.

Points:

6 (6%)

Identifies either a health topic and/or community but not both. No understanding of the socio-ecological approach.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Intrapersonal/Individual: Motivating change in individual behavior by increasing knowledge, or influencing attitudes or challenging beliefs. (CLO 1 & 3)

Points:

10 (10%)

Clearly and comprehensively identifies/understands the intrapersonal/individual level. Clearly comprehends individual's knowledge about the health behavior. Identifies several ways to increase knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding the health behavior.

Points:

9 (9%)

Clearly explains in detail the intrapersonal/individual level. Identifies and gives examples of knowledge, attitudes regarding health behavior. This section could use more detail and additional examples to make it stronger.

Points:

8 (8%)

Good understanding of the intrapersonal/individual level. Identifies sufficient information to explain the need to increase knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. This section needs additional examples to make section stronger.

Points:

7 (7%)

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the intrapersonal/individual level. This section is adequate but needs additional information to fully understand. Needs additional examples.

Points:

6 (6%)

Weak/limited understanding of the intrapersonal/individual level. No examples or wrong examples provided to improve knowledge, attitude, and behavior change.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Interpersonal:Recognizing that groups provide social identity and support, interpersonal interventions target groups, such as family members, peers or fellow employees. (CLO 1 & CLO 3)

Points:

10 (10%)

Clearly and comprehensively identifies/understands interpersonal level. Identifies and provides several examples on how social networks and support can influence health behavior change (i.e. family, friends, health workers, support groups, etc).

Points:

9 (9%)

Clearly explains interpersonal level. Identifies and gives examples on how social networks and support can influence health behavior. This section could use additional information and examples to make it stronger.

Points:

8 (8%)

Good understanding of the interpersonal level. Identifies a few examples on how social networks and support can influence health behavior. This section needs additional information to make it stronger.

Points:

7 (7%)

Demonstrates a basic understanding of interpersonal level. This section is adequate but needs additional information to fully understand. Needs additional examples.

Points:

6 (6%)

Weak/limited understanding of the interpersonal level. No examples or wrong examples provided. Inadequate information on how social support and networks influence health behavior.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Organizational/Institutional: Changing the policies, practices and physical environment of an organization (e.g., a worksite programs, a health care setting, state/local health departments , or another type of organization) to support behavior change. (CLO 4 & 5)

Points:

15 (15%)

Clearly comprehends/identifies organizational level. Provides several examples of how organizational systems and policies can support health behavior change (I.e. worksite wellness programs, state/local health departments, health insurance plans, medi-care/medi-caid, etc).

Points:

13.5 (13.5%)

Clearly explains organizational level. Identifies and gives examples on how organizations can support and/or influence health behavior. This section could use additional information and examples to make it stronger.

Points:

12 (12%)

Good understanding of the organizational level. Identifies a few examples on how organizations support and influence health behavior change. This section needs additional information to make it stronger.

Points:

10.5 (10.5%)

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the organizational level. This section is adequate but needs additional information to fully understand. Needs additional examples.

Points:

9 (9%)

Weak/limited understanding of the organizational level. No examples or wrong examples provided. Inadequate information on how organizations can support/influence behavior change.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Community: Coordinating the efforts of all members of a community (organizations, community leaders, and citizens) to bring about change. Developing and enforcing local policies and ordinances that support beneficial health behaviors. (CLO 4 & 5)

Points:

15 (15%)

Clearly comprehends/identifies community level. Provides several examples of how community efforts can support health behavior change (I.e. faith based institutions, local media, community based organizations, research institutions, community health collaborative/coalitions).

Points:

13.5 (13.5%)

Clearly explains community level. Identifies and gives examples on how community efforts can support and/or influence health behavior. This section could use additional information and examples to make it stronger.

Points:

12 (12%)

Good understanding of the community level. Identifies a few examples on how community efforts can support and influence health behavior change. This section needs additional information to make it stronger.

Points:

10.5 (10.5%)

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the community level. This section is adequate but needs additional information to fully understand. Needs additional examples.

Points:

9 (9%)

Weak/limited understanding of the community level. No examples or wrong examples provided. Inadequate information on how community efforts can support/influence behavior change.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Public Policy/Societal: Developing and enforcing national and/or state policies and laws that can increase beneficial health behaviors. Developing media campaigns that promote awareness of the health needs and advocacy for change. (CLO 4 & 5)

Points:

15 (15%)

Clearly comprehends/identifies societal/public policy level. Provides several examples of how policy efforts can support health behavior change (i.e. Healthy People 2020, ACA, National and/or state laws, federal wide programs, NIH, CDC, etc).

Points:

13.5 (13.5%)

Clearly explains societal/public policy level. Identifies and gives examples on how policy efforts can support and/or influence health behavior. This section could use additional information and examples to make it stronger.

Points:

12 (12%)

Good understanding of the societal/public policy level. Identifies a few examples on how policy efforts can support and influence health behavior change. This section needs additional information to make it stronger.

Points:

10.5 (10.5%)

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the societal/public policy level. This section is adequate but needs additional information to fully understand. Needs additional examples.

Points:

9 (9%)

Weak/limited understanding of the public policy/societal level. No examples or wrong examples provided. Inadequate information on how policy efforts can support/influence behavior change.

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling. (ILO 1 & 2)

Points:

5 (5%)

All sentences are well -constructed with varied structure. All sentences sound natural and are easy -on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis. Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes no errors in capitalization. Writer uses vivid vocabulary and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind.

Points:

4.5 (4.5%)

Most sentences are well-constructed. Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1-2 are stiff/awkward or difficult to understand. Writer makes few errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer uses good choice in vocabulary.

Points:

4 (4%)

Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure. Several sentences are stiff/awkward or are difficult to understand. Writer makes some errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow. Writer uses decent vocabulary.

Points:

3.5 (3.5%)

Multiple sentences appear incomplete or run-on. Multiple sentences are difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward/stiff. Writer makes many grammar and/or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow. Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest.

Points:

3 (3%)

Major spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors throughout paper. Jargon present and distracts from the meaning of the paper. Major areas sound awkward and content does not make sense (or limited).

Points:

0 (0%)

This portion of the assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA 6th Edition In-Text Citations

Points:

10 (10%)

APA style in-text citations used throughout document with no errors and/or no quotations longer than 5 words.

Points:

9 (9%)

APA style in-text citations used throughout document with minor (less than 3) errors and/or no quotations longer than 5 words.

Points:

8 (8%)

APA style in-text citations used throughout document with moderate (more than 3 errors). Quotations used are longer than 5 words.

Points:

7 (7%)

APA style in-text citations with major errors throughout. Quotations longer than 5 words.

Points:

6 (6%)

Major APA style in-text citation errors throughout. Quotations used are paragraph in length.

Points:

0 (0%)

No use of APA in-text citations.

APA 6th Edition Referencing

Points:

5 (5%)

APA reference page has at least 7-10, or more than 10 scholarly sources. More than 3 peer reviewed journal articles referenced.

Points:

4.5 (4.5%)

APA reference page contains 7-10 reliable or scholarly sources but has minor formatting errors. Paper has at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles.

Points:

3.5 (3.5%)

APA reference page contains reliable or scholarly sources but has moderate formatting errors. Paper has at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles.

Points:

3.5 (3.5%)

APA reference page does not contain 7-10 reliable or scholarly resources and has major formatting errors. Paper has at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles.

Points:

3 (3%)

APA references page does not contain 7-10 reliable or scholarly resources. Paper has major formatting errors. Does not have at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles.

Points:

0 (0%)

APA reference page is missing or significantly lacking. Major formatting errors and no use of peer reviewed journal articles.

Timely Submission

Points:

5 (5%)

Submitted early or on-time.

Points:

4.5 (4.5%)

Submitted less than one hour past the deadline.

Points:

4 (4%)

Submitted less than 12 hours past the deadline.

Points:

3.5 (3.5%)

Submitted between 12 and 24 hours past the deadline.

Points:

3 (3%)

Submitted 24-48 hours beyond deadline.

Points:

0 (0%)

No submission or submitted past 48 hour deadline.