W10/11A6 FINAL HEALTHCARE BUDGET REQUEST

NURS_6211_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a worksheet that records the following: Conduct analyses as directed on either your organization’s financial statements or those provided in the Sample Financial Statements document. Your analysis will include spreadsheet calculations of financial statement ratios.

40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe analysis clearly presents all ratio analyses, calculated accurately and as directed.

35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe analysis presents all ratio analyses, calculated accurately and as directed.

31 to >27.0 ptsFairThe analysis presents ratio analyses inaccurately or not calculated as directed.

27 to >0 ptsPoorThe analysis presents ratio analyses inaccurately or not calculated as directed, or with items missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the results of each statement analysis. What do the results of each analysis mean? What does your complete financial statement analysis suggest about the financial health of the organization? If using your current organization’s data, does your analysis help describe any observed organizational behaviors or actions? Explain. What assumptions have you made in your analyses?   What implications do these analyses have for your proposed healthcare product or service?  

70 to >62.0 ptsExcellentThe analysis clearly and thoroughly describes the results of each statement analysis, including an accurate and well-developed interpretation of the results. ... The analysis accurately explains in detail what the complete financial statement analysis suggests about the financial health of the organization. ... The analysis includes an accurate explanation in detail as to how the analysis may help describe observed organizational behaviors or actions. ... The analysis includes an accurate an detailed explanation of the implications of the results on the proposed healthcare product or service.

62 to >55.0 ptsGoodThe analysis describes the results of each statement analysis, including a valid interpretation of the results. ... The analysis explains what the complete financial statement analysis suggests about the financial health of the organization. ... The analysis includes an explanation as to how the analysis may help describe observed organizational behaviors or actions. ... The analysis includes an explanation of the implications of the results on the proposed healthcare product or service.

55 to >54.0 ptsFairThe analysis vaguely describes the results of each statement analysis, including an interpretation of the results that is inaccurate. ... The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains what the complete financial statement analysis suggests about the financial health of the organization. ... The analysis includes an explanation of how the analysis may help describe observed organizational behaviors or actions that is inaccurate or vague. ... The analysis includes an explanation of the implications of the results on the proposed healthcare product or service that is inaccurate or vague.

54 to >0 ptsPoorThe analysis inaccurately and vaguely describes the results of each statement analysis, including inaccurate or incorrect interpretations of the results, or is missing. ... The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains what the complete financial statement analysis suggests about the financial health of the organization, or is missing. ... The analysis includes an inaccurate and vague explanation as to how the analysis may help describe observed organizational behaviors or actions, or is missing. ... The analysis includes an inaccurate and vague explanation of the implications of the results on the proposed healthcare product or service, or is missing.

70 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompile and summarize your work in previous assignment. You may choose to use the Healthcare Budget Request template, located in the Learning Resources, or create a format of your own. Your final Healthcare Budget Request should include: A final version of your Executive Summary A final version of your projected expenses and revenues A product/service budget for the launch and first 5 years A summary of financial and SWOT analyses that you conducted, including your interpretation of the results A 3- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation containing the final version of your elevator speech, incorporating selling points from your analyses that you believe make the business case for leadership commitment to your proposed healthcare product or service

60 to >53.0 ptsExcellentA comprehensive and detailed summary is provided which includes: ... A well-developed, accurate and detailed Executive summary. ... A well-developed, accurate and detailed explanation of projected expenses and revenues. ... An accurate, detailed, and complete budget for the launch and first 5 years of implementation for the healthcare product or service proposed. ... A well-developed, accurate, and detailed summary of financial and SWOT analyses that were conducted, including a detailed and accurate interpretation of the results. ... A well-developed and accurate presentation that fully details the elevator speech used to communicate the business case for the healthcare product or service proposed.

53 to >47.0 ptsGoodAn accurate summary is provided which includes: ... An accurate Executive summary. ... An accurate explanation of projected expenses and revenues. ... An accurate budget for the launch and first 5 years of implementation for the healthcare product or service proposed. ... An accurate summary of financial and SWOT analyses that were conducted, including an interpretation of the results. ... An accurate presentation that somewhat details the elevator speech used to communicate the business case for the healthcare product or service proposed.

47 to >41.0 ptsFairA vague or inaccurate summary is provided which includes: ... An inaccurate or vague Executive summary. ... An inaccurate or vague explanation of projected expenses and revenues. ... An inaccurate or vague budget for the launch and first 5 years of implementation for the healthcare product or service proposed. ... An inaccurate or vague summary of financial and SWOT analyses that were conducted, including an inaccurate or incomplete interpretation of the results. ... An inaccurate or vague presentation that does not full detail the elevator speech used to communicate the business case for the healthcare product or service proposed.

41 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague summary is provided which includes: ... An inaccurate, incomplete and vague Executive summary, or is missing. ... An in accurate and incomplete explanation of projected expenses and revenues, or is missing. ... An inaccurate and incomplete budget for the launch and first 5 years of implementation for the healthcare product or service proposed, or is missing. ... An inaccurate and vague summary of financial and SWOT analyses that were conducted, including an inaccurate or incomplete interpretation of the results, or is missing. ... An inaccurate, vague, or incomplete presentation that may detail the elevator speech used to communicate the business case for the healthcare product or service proposed, or is missing.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided that delineates all required criteria.

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.

8 to >6.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

6 to >5.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

5 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

8 to >6.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

6 to >5.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

5 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

8 to >6.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

6 to >5.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) APA format errors.

5 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

10 pts