Human Resource Management HUMN RESOURCES WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT REVISION

HUMN_6000_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

HUMN_6000_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Develop a 3- to 4-page APA-style paper that examines a human services–related problem and how to address it. You must include evidence from at least three peer-reviewed empirical studies that you accessed in the library.

10 to >8.9 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The paper includes evidence from at least three peer-reviewed empirical studies.

8.9 to >7.9 pts

Meets Expectations

N/A

7.9 to >6.9 pts

Fair

N/A

6.9 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper includes evidence from fewer than three peer-reviewed empirical studies.

8 / 10 pts

Be sure to: Identify and describe the problem.

50 to >44.5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Identification and description of the problem demonstrates a thorough and evident understanding of the problem and its importance.

44.5 to >39.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Identification and description of the problem demonstrates an evident understanding of the problem and its importance.

39.5 to >34.5 pts

Fair

Identification and description of the problem demonstrates a limited understanding of the problem and its importance.

34.5 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Identification and description of the problem demonstrates little or no understanding of the problem and its importance.

42 / 50 pts

Explain how the empirical studies apply to or are relevant to the problem.

50 to >44.5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explanation of how the empirical studies apply to or are relevant to the problem is thorough and well developed, with critical thinking and a scholarly disposition. Provides specific and convincing evidence.

44.5 to >39.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Explanation of how the empirical studies apply to or are relevant to the problem is general but developed. Provides relevant evidence.

39.5 to >34.5 pts

Fair

Explanation of how the empirical studies apply to or are relevant to the problem is limited. Some evidence may be provided, but connection of evidence to the problem is vague.

34.5 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Explanation of how the empirical studies apply to or are relevant to the problem shows little or no consideration or effort.

43 / 50 pts

Explain how the studies address or provide solutions to the problem.

60 to >53.4 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explanation of how the studies address or provide solutions to the problem is thorough and well developed, with critical thinking and a scholarly disposition. Provides specific and convincing evidence.

53.4 to >47.4 pts

Meets Expectations

Explanation of how the studies address or provide solutions to the problem is general but developed. Provides relevant evidence.

47.4 to >41.4 pts

Fair

Explanation of how the studies address or provide solutions to the problem is limited. Some evidence may be provided, but connection of evidence to the problem is vague.

41.4 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Explanation of how the studies address or provide solutions to the problem shows little or no consideration or effort.

50 / 60 pts

Scholarly Writing and APA Style

30 to >26.7 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The paper is clear and coherent. Student writes with proper grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. Fewer than 5 errors occur in the paper. The paper displays proper scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly and integrates and analyzes it effectively. Includes citations and a reference list that are mostly formatted correctly in APA Style. Headings and paper formatting reflect proper APA.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Meets Expectations

The paper is mostly clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (5-8), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly, but integration and analysis could be improved. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain minor APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain minor APA errors.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (9-12) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper has lapses in scholarly voice. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. Student occasionally paraphrases source information incorrectly. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain major APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain major APA errors

20.7 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (13+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes. Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list or to format the paper in APA Style.

25 / 30 pts

Total Points: 168