Week 2 Discussion

SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Activity: Week 1 Discussion

Course: MKT3010-Marketing Management SU01

Name: Sandra Villarreal

Response No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 points

Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points

Exemplary (A: 36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality of Initial Posting 0 / 40The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the

assignment’s topic, and/or

does not answer the

question(s) fully. Response

demonstrates incomplete

understanding of the topic

and/or inadequate

preparation.

The information provided is

accurate, giving a basic

understanding of the topic(s)

covered. A basic

understanding is when you

are able to describe the terms

and concepts covered.

Despite this basic

understanding, initial posting

may not include complete

development of all aspects of

the assignment.

The information provided is

accurate, displaying a good

understanding of the topic(s)

covered. A good

understanding is when you

are able to explain the terms

and topics covered. Initial

posting demonstrates sincere

reflection and addresses most

aspects of the assignment,

although all concepts may not

be fully developed.

The information provided is

accurate, providing an in-

depth, well thought-out

understanding of the topic(s)

covered. An in-depth

understanding provides an

analysis of the information,

synthesizing what is learned

from the course/assigned

readings.

Criterion Feedback

You have not submitted an initial post for this assignment. You should be sure to review the lectures and readings for the week and attempt to answer the assignment. Even partial credit is better than none!

Participation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation in Discussion 0 / 20May include one or more of the following:

*Comments to only one other

student's post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as just one

line or saying, “Good job” or “I

agree.

*Comments are off topic.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts but

only on one day of the week.

Comments are substantive,

meaning they reflect and

expand on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts on

more than one day.

Comments are substantive,

meaning they reflect and

expand on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts and to

the instructor's comment (if

applicable) on two or more

days. Responses demonstrate

an analysis of peers’

comments, building on

previous posts. Comments

extend and deepen

meaningful conversation and

may include a follow-up

question.

Criterion Feedback

You have not responded to any of your classmates for the discussion this week. This is an essential component of discussion assignments. Please carefully review the participation policy here so you can earn maximum

credit in the coming weeks.

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

No initial posting exists to

evaluate.

No responses to other

classmates were posted in

this discussion forum.

Total 0 / 80

Overall Score

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation

Style) and Information Literacy

0 / 20Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar,

mechanics, spelling, use of

slang, and incomplete or

missing citations and

references. If required for the

assignment, did not use

course, text, and/or outside

readings (where relevant) to

support work.

Some spelling, grammatical,

and/or structural errors are

present. Some errors in

formatting citations and

references are present. If

required for the assignment,

utilizes sources to support

work for initial post but not

comments to other students.

Sources include course/text

readings but outside sources

(when relevant) include non-

academic/authoritative, such

as Wikis and .com resources.

Minor errors in grammar,

mechanics, or spelling in the

initial posting are present.

Minor errors in formatting

citations and references may

exist. If required for the

assignment, utilizes sources to

support work for both the

initial post and some of the

comments to other students.

Sources include course and

text readings as well as

outside sources (when

relevant) that are academic

and authoritative (e.g., journal

articles, other text books, .gov

Web sites, professional

organization Web sites, cases,

statutes, or administrative

rules).

Minor to no errors exist in

grammar, mechanics, or

spelling in both the initial post

and comments to others.

Formatting of citations and

references is correct. If

required for the assignment,

utilizes sources to support

work for both the initial post

and the comments to other

students. Sources include

course and text readings as

well as outside sources (when

relevant) that are academic

and authoritative (e.g., journal

articles, other text books, .gov

Web sites, professional

organization Web sites, cases,

statutes, or administrative

rules).

No Submission 0 points minimum

There was no submission for

this assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not been met on the

competencies for this assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the

competencies for this assignment.

Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum

Proficiency has been achieved on the

competencies for this assignment.

Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimum

The competencies for this assignment

have been mastered.

No postings for which to

evaluate language and

grammar exist.