Healthcare Policy

profilesid_fly
RubricEvaluationResults-MHA520HealthCarePolicy2020MAR09FT-1-TridentUniversityInternati.pdf

Total 30 / 30

Overall Score

Close

Criteria Level 4 - Excellent Level 3 - Proficient Level 2 - Developing Level 1 - Emerging

Assignment-

Driven

Criteria

10 / 10

Cri!cal

Thinking 10 / 10

Scholarly

Wri!ng,

Referencing,

and

Organiza!on

7 / 7

Timeliness 3 / 3

8 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency covering all key

elements of the assignment.

6 points

Demonstrates par!al proficiency

covering all key elements of the

assignment.

4 points

Demonstrates limited or poor

proficiency covering all key

elements of the assignment.

8 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency conceptualizing the

issue. Viewpoints and assump!ons

of experts are proficiently analyzed,

synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are presented with

necessary ra!onale.

6 points

Demonstrates par!al proficiency

conceptualizing the issue. Viewpoints

and assump!ons of experts are

somewhat analyzed, synthesized, and

evaluated. Conclusions are somewhat

consistent with the analysis and

findings.

4 points

Demonstrates limited or poor

proficiency conceptualizing the

issue. Viewpoints and assump!ons

of experts are either absent or

poorly analyzed, synthesized, and

evaluated. Conclusions are either

absent or poorly conceived and

supported.

5 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency in:

scholarly wri"en communica!on;

using relevant and quality sources

to support ideas; using in-text

cita!ons and properly forma#ng

references; following the required

structure and organiza!on of the

assignment, including use of

headings to guide the flow of the

document.

4 points

Demonstrates par!al proficiency in:

scholarly wri"en communica!on; using

relevant and quality sources to support

ideas; using in-text cita!ons and

properly forma#ng references;

following the required structure and

organiza!on of the assignment,

including use of headings to guide the

flow of the document.

1 point

Demonstrates limited or poor

proficiency in:

scholarly wri"en communica!on;

using relevant and quality sources

to support ideas; using in-text

cita!ons and properly forma#ng

references; following the required

structure and organiza!on of the

assignment, including use of

headings to guide the flow of the

document.

2 points

Assignment submi"ed 1-2 days

a$er module due date.

1 point

Assignment submi"ed 3-4 days a$er

module due date.

0 points

Assignment submi"ed 5 or more

days a$er module due date.

Level 4 27 points minimum

Level 3 24 points minimum

Level 2 21 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum

10 points

Demonstrates mastery covering all key

elements of the assignment in a

substan!ve way.

10 points

Demonstrates mastery in

conceptualizing the issue. Viewpoints

and assump!ons of experts are

analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are logically presented

with appropriate ra!onale.

7 points

Demonstrates mastery in: scholarly

wri"en communica!on; using relevant

and quality sources to support ideas;

using in-text cita!ons and properly

forma#ng references; following the

required structure and organiza!on of

the assignment, including use of

headings to guide the flow of the

document.

3 points

Assignment submi"ed on !me or

arranged in advance with professor for

an approved extension on due date.