Discussion Post wk 2

profileJlm1128
RubricDiscussionWk2.pdf

9/11/22, 8:26 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280047_1

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Main Posting 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully

40 (40%) - 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or

35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are super"cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources.

0 (0%) - 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or super"cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written

Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

9/11/22, 8:26 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280047_1

adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.

clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness

10 (10%) - 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response

17 (17%) - 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at

15 (15%) - 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more

13 (13%) - 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few

0 (0%) - 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.

9/11/22, 8:26 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 3 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280047_1

least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English.

credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English.

or no credible sources are cited.

Second Response

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.

9/11/22, 8:26 PMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 4 of 4https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280047_1

synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English.

written in standard, edited English.

Participation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di#erent days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT