week 6 Assignment - You Are a Consultant!

Unacceptable NeedsImprovement Competent Exemplary

Suggest two key ways in which the proposed teamwork project would affect organizational performance.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or did not suggest two key ways in which the proposed teamwork project would affect organizational performance.

18 (11.25%) Partially suggested two key ways in which the proposed teamwork project would affect organizational performance.

20.4 (12.75%) Satisfactorily suggested two key ways in which the proposed teamwork project would affect organizational performance.

24 (15.00%) Thoroughly suggested two key ways in which the proposed teamwork project would affect organizational performance.

Recommend where the company should set limits on spending and on using company assets for socially responsible projects. Predict the main effect that socially responsible projects could have on the company’s overall bottom line.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or did not recommend where the company should set limits on spending and on using company assets for socially responsible projects. Did not submit or did not predict the main effect that socially responsible projects could have on the company’s overall bottom line.

18 (11.25%) Partially recommended where the company should set limits on spending and on using company assets for socially responsible projects. Partially predicted the main effect that socially responsible projects could have on the company’s overall bottom line.

20.4 (12.75%) Satisfactorily recommended where the company should set limits on spending and on using company assets for socially responsible projects. Satisfactorily predicted the main effect that socially responsible projects could have on the company’s overall bottom line.

24 (15.00%) Thoroughly recommended where the company should set limits on spending and on using company assets for socially responsible projects. Thoroughly predicted the main effect that socially responsible projects could have on the company’s overall bottom line.

Propose two approaches geared toward introducing the topic of ethics or ethical behavior in the teamwork training project.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or did not propose two approaches geared toward introducing the topic of ethics or ethical behavior in the teamwork training project.

18 (11.25%) Partially proposed two approaches geared toward introducing the topic of ethics or ethical behavior in the teamwork training project.

20.4 (12.75%) Satisfactorily proposed two approaches geared toward introducing the topic of ethics or ethical behavior in the teamwork training project.

24 (15.00%) Thoroughly proposed two approaches geared toward introducing the topic of ethics or ethical behavior in the teamwork training project.

Name: w06a1

Description: w06a1 - You Are a Consultant! ExitExit

Grid View List View

Unacceptable NeedsImprovement Competent Exemplary

Examine two aspects of teamwork training that changes a person into a transformational leader. Justify your response.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or did not examine two aspects of teamwork training that changes a person into a transformational leader. Did not submit or did not justify your response.

18 (11.25%) Partially examined two aspects of teamwork training that changes a person into a transformational leader. Partially justified your response.

20.4 (12.75%) Satisfactorily examined two aspects of teamwork training that changes a person into a transformational leader. Satisfactorily justified your response.

24 (15.00%) Thoroughly examined two aspects of teamwork training that changes a person into a transformational leader. Thoroughly justified your response.

Predict your possible reaction to a team member’s suggestion of another theme that does not relate in any way to the theme that you have proposed. Provide a rationale for your response.

0 (0.00%) Did not submit or did not predict your possible reaction to a team member’s suggestion of another theme that does not relate in any way to the theme that you have proposed. Did not submit or did not provide a rationale for your response.

18 (11.25%) Partially predicted your possible reaction to a team member’s suggestion of another theme that does not relate in any way to the theme that you have proposed. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

20.4 (12.75%) Satisfactorily predicted your possible reaction to a team member’s suggestion of another theme that does not relate in any way to the theme that you have proposed. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

24 (15.00%) Thoroughly predicted your possible reaction to a team member’s suggestion of another theme that does not relate in any way to the theme that you have proposed. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

Five references. 0 (0.00%) No references provided.

6 (3.75%) Does not meet the number of required references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.

6.8 (4.25%) Meets the number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

8 (5.00%) Exceeds the number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting.

0 (0.00%) Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting.

6 (3.75%) Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting.

6.8 (4.25%) Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting.

8 (5.00%) Error-free or almost error-free grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting.

Unacceptable NeedsImprovement Competent Exemplary

Appropriate use of SWS in-text citations and a reference section.

0 (0.00%) Lack of in-text citations, lack of a reference section, or lack of both.

6 (3.75%) In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in SWS style.

6.8 (4.25%) Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in SWS style.

8 (5.00%) In-text citations and references are error-free or almost error-free and are consistently formatted correctly in SWS style.

Information literacy and integration of sources.

0 (0.00%) Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in- text citations.

6 (3.75%) Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

6.8 (4.25%) Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

8 (5.00%) Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Clarity and coherence of writing.

0 (0.00%) Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

6 (3.75%) Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

6.8 (4.25%) Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

8 (5.00%) Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Name:w06a1

Description:w06a1 - You Are a Consultant! ExitExit