Assignment 2: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Patient Case Presentation
yemisij
RubricDetailWK7.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6635_Week7_Assignment2_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photo ID display and professional attire | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. Feedback: |
| Time | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) Feedback: |
| Description of chief complaint and history of present illness | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. Feedback: |
| Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. Feedback: |
| Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback: |
| Discussion of diagnostics with results | Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback: |
| Diagnosis with three (3) differentials | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The student provides an accurate diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3 or incomplete diagnosis with differentials. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Less than 2 diagnosis. Feedback: |
| Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: |
| Presentation style | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. Feedback: |
Photo ID display and professional attire--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. Good 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Fair 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Poor 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. Feedback:Time--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. Good 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Fair 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Poor 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) Feedback:Description of chief complaint and history of present illness--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Fair 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. Feedback:Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Fair 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. Feedback:Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Good 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Fair 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Poor 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:Discussion of diagnostics with results--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:Diagnosis with three (3) differentials--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The student provides an accurate diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3 or incomplete diagnosis with differentials. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Less than 2 diagnosis. Feedback:Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback:Presentation style--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. Fair 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused Poor 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: PRAC_6635_Week7_Assignment2_Rubric
