Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_id=_2559590_1 1/5
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Name: NURS_6512_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_id=_2559590_1 2/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template: · Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned.
· Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case.
45 (45%) - 50 (50%)
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
39 (39%) - 44 (44%)
The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
33 (33%) - 38 (38%)
The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected.
0 (0%) - 32 (32%)
The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_id=_2559590_1 3/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
· List �ve di�erent possible conditions for the patient's di�erential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.
30 (30%) - 35 (35%)
The response lists �ve distinctly di�erent and detailed possible conditions for a di�erential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justi�cation for each of the �ve conditions selected.
24 (24%) - 29 (29%)
The response lists four or �ve di�erent possible conditions for a di�erential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justi�cation for each of the �ve conditions selected.
18 (18%) - 23 (23%)
The response lists three to �ve possible conditions for a di�erential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justi�cation for each.
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response lists two or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a di�erential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justi�cation for each condition selected.
9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_id=_2559590_1 4/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_id=_2559590_1 5/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 (3%) - 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6512_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric
EXIT