Evolution of Talent Management

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Exceptional/Full Points Very Good Competent Developing

Needs Improvement Missing

Element 1a: Initial Post - Evolution of Definitions

10.2 (20%) Student provides a thorough and detailed explanation of how the definitions of talent and talent management evolved to current-day thinking. Explanation is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience.

9.38 (18.4%) Student provides a detailed explanation of how the definitions of talent and talent management evolved to current-day thinking. Explanation is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Explanation is comprehensive, but missing one or two minor details.

8.67 (17%) Student provides an explanation of how the definitions of talent and talent management evolved to current-day thinking. Explanation is supported with at least one reference from course textbook or other source and/or at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.

7.65 (15%) Student provides a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of how the definitions of talent and talent management evolved to current-day thinking. Most details are missing and/or explanation is not substantiated with sources or examples.

6.12 (12%) Student provides a post that does not meet minimum requirements.

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Element 1b: Initial Post - Best Definitions

5.1 (10%) Student composes what he/she believes are the best definitions for talent and talent management. There are no errors.

4.69 (9.2%) Student composes what he/she believes are the best definitions for talent and talent management. There are one or two minor errors/details missing.

4.33 (8.5%) Student composes what he/she believes are the best definitions for talent and talent management. There are some errors/details missing.

3.83 (7.5%) Student composes what he/she believes are the best definitions for each. There are many errors/details missing.

3.06 (6%) Student provides a post that does not meet minimum requirements.

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Name: MHRM_6110_Week1_Discussion1_Rubric

Grid View List View

Element 1c: Initial Post - How Organizations Define Talent and Talent Management

15.3 (30%) Student provides a thorough and detailed explanation defending whether he/she thinks it makes a difference how organizations define talent and talent management or whether it is just semantics. Explanation is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience.

14.08 (27.6%) Student provides a detailed explanation defending whether he/she thinks it makes a difference how organizations define talent and talent management or whether it is just semantics. Explanation is supported by at least one relevant, scholarly source from course articles or updated research and at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Explanation is comprehensive, but missing one or two minor details.

13.01 (25.5%) Student provides an explanation defending whether he/she thinks it makes a difference how organizations define talent and talent management or whether it is just semantics. Explanation is supported with at least one reference from course textbook or other source and/or at least one experiential example from current events or own experience. Some details are missing and/or not fully developed.

11.47 (22.5%) Student provides a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details defending whether he/she thinks it makes a difference how organizations define talent and talent management or whether it is just semantics. Most details are missing and/or explanation is not substantiated with sources or examples.

9.18 (18%) Student provides a post that does not meet minimum requirements.

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Element 2 - Peer Feedback Interaction

12.75 (25%) Student posts relevant, thorough, insightful, and scholarly responses providing feedback to at least two classmates. Responses promote further conversation by adding examples or evidence, presenting new ideas, or asking questions and at least two responses include citations and references to support his/her thinking.

11.73 (23%) Student posts relevant, insightful, and thorough responses providing feedback to at least two classmates. Responses promote further conversation by adding examples or evidence, presenting new ideas, or asking questions and at least one response had a reference and citation to support his/her thinking.

10.84 (21.25%) Student posts responses to at least two classmates providing some relevant feedback. Responses promote further conversation by adding examples or evidence, presenting new ideas, or asking questions. Few if any citations support his/her thinking.

9.56 (18.75%) Student posts responses to at least two classmates providing some feedback to further the conversation.

7.65 (15%) Student's responses provide some feedback but fail to promote further conversation and/or is an exceptional response but only to one classmate (i.e., only one response was posted during the week).

0 (0%) Student does not submit this element.

Element 3: Organization and

7.65 (15%) 7.04 (13.8%) 6.5 5.74 4.59 (9%) 0 (0%)

Writing/Form/Style Student demonstrates thorough organization and writing skills by consistently applying APA format and style. Writing is well- organized and grammatically correct including complete sentences that are free of spelling errors. A reference list with a variety of scholarly resources is provided, using APA formatting, and it matches the citations cited within the text.

Student demonstrates thorough organization and writing skills by consistently applying APA format and style. Writing is well-organized and grammatically correct including complete sentences that are free of spelling errors. A reference list with a variety of scholarly sources is provided, using APA formatting, and it matches the citations cited within the text, but with one or two minor errors.

(12.75%) Student demonstrates organization and writing skills by mostly applying APA format and style. Writing is well- organized and mostly grammatically correct including complete sentences that are mostly free of spelling errors. While a reference list is provided and includes a variety of resources, APA formatting may be incorrect or the list may not have matched the citations cited within the text.

(11.25%) Student made a cursory attempt to address but there are numerous errors, writing is difficult to read, and/or no reference list is provided.

Student posts do not adhere to the writing expectations.

Student did not submit discussion posts.

Name: MHRM_6110_Week1_Discussion1_Rubric

EXIT