Assignment: Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders
yemisij
RUBRICDETAILSFORNURS6521.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing. Feedback: |
| Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Accurate examples may be provided to support the response. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy, or is missing. Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing. Feedback: |
| Explain how you might improve the patient's drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan, or is missing. The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors Feedback: |
Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing. Feedback:Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Accurate examples may be provided to support the response. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy, or is missing. Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing. Feedback:Explain how you might improve the patient's drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response accurately explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan, or is missing. The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
