Discussion

Outstanding Performance

Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Proficient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%)

• Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. • Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%)

• Responds to the discusion question(s) • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. • 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth • Supported by at least 3 credible references

Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

• Responds to most of the discusion question(s) • Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth • Supported by at least 3 credible references

Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%)

• Responds to some of the discusion question(s) • One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed • Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis • Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. • Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%)

• Does not respond to the discusion question(s) • Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria •lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis • Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. • Contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting: Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)

• Written clearly and concisely • Contains no grammatical or spelling errors • Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)

• Written clearly and concisely • May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

• Written concisely • May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

•Writtten somewhat concisely • May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors • Contains some APA formatting erros

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

• Not written clearly or concisely • Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors • Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

Points Range: 10 (10%) - 10 (10%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts main discussion by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings • Responds to questions posed by faculty • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)

• Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)

• Response is on topic, may have some depth

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

• Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Reponse: Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

• Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources • Response is written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

• Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed • Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective • Response to faculty questions are missing • No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings • Responds to questions posed by faculty • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%)

• Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%)

• Response is on topic, may have some depth

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

• Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Reponse: Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

• Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources • Response is written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%)

• Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed • Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)

>• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective • Response to faculty questions are missing • No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100