Assignment 2: Clinical Skills Self-Assessment
yemisij
RubricDetailPracWK1.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6675_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides ratings for all skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides ratings for most of the skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides ratings for some of the skills on the form. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response provides ratings for only a few skills on the form, or ratings are missing. Feedback: |
| Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. Feedback: |
| Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3–4 measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides 3–4 clear, appropriate, and measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides 3–4 appropriate, measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. Feedback: |
|
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling, nor short and lacking substance. Clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: |
|
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
The assignment follows correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting—APA Format: The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and the reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains ≥5 APA format errors. Feedback: |
Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the skills identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides ratings for all skills on the form. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides ratings for most of the skills on the form. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides ratings for some of the skills on the form. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response provides ratings for only a few skills on the form, or ratings are missing. Feedback:Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. Feedback:Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3–4 measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides 3–4 clear, appropriate, and measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides 3–4 appropriate, measurable goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling, nor short and lacking substance. Clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
The assignment follows correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting—APA Format: The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and the reference list.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains ≥5 APA format errors. Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: PRAC_6675_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric
