Assignment 5: Preparing for the Agency’s Future, Part 5
Kristin Velix
RubricDetailPAD530001VA016-1186-002.htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: PAD530 Week 9 Assignment 4: Analysis of the Agency’s Policies, Procedures, and Plans Regarding Unions, Privatization, Pensions, and Productivity, Part 4
Description: PAD530 Week 9 Assignment 4: Analysis of the Agency’s Policies, Procedures, and Plans Regarding Unions, Privatization, Pensions, and Productivity, Part 4
| Unacceptable Below 70% F | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAD530-A4-1 1. Revise the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Weight: 5% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 7.68 (3.49%) Did not submit or incompletely revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7.7 (3.5%) - 8.78 (3.99%) Partially revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8.8 (4%) - 9.88 (4.49%) Satisfactorily revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback: | Points: 10.45 (4.75%) Points Range: 9.9 (4.5%) - 11 (5%) Thoroughly revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-2 2. Evaluate the practicality of union presence in your selected agency and recommend at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Weight: 15% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; did not submit or incompletely recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; partially recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; satisfactorily recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Feedback: | Points: 31.35 (14.25%) Points Range: 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; thoroughly recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-3 3. Evaluate the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency and recommend at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Weight: 15% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; did not submit or incompletely recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; partially recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; satisfactorily recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Feedback: | Points: 31.35 (14.25%) Points Range: 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; thoroughly recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-4 4. Analyze at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Weight: 15% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Feedback: | Points: 31.35 (14.25%) Points Range: 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-5 5. Assess the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Weight:15% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: 31.35 (14.25%) Points Range: 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-6 6. Recommend at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Weight:15% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: | Points: 31.35 (14.25%) Points Range: 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-7 7. 4 references. (Include no more than one non-government Website) Weight: 10% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 15.38 (6.99%) Does not meet the required number of references Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 15.4 (7%) - 17.58 (7.99%) Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 17.6 (8%) - 19.78 (8.99%) Meets number of required references; all references good quality choices. Feedback: | Points: 20.9 (9.5%) Points Range: 19.8 (9%) - 22 (10%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. Feedback: |
| PAD530-A4-8 8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 15.38 (6.99%) More than 6 errors present Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 15.4 (7%) - 17.58 (7.99%) 5-6 errors present Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 17.6 (8%) - 19.78 (8.99%) 3-4 errors present Feedback: | Points: 20.9 (9.5%) Points Range: 19.8 (9%) - 22 (10%) 0-2 errors present Feedback: |
PAD530-A4-1 1. Revise the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 7.68 (3.49%) Did not submit or incompletely revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Fair 70-79% C 7.7 (3.5%) - 8.78 (3.99%) Partially revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Proficient 80-89% B 8.8 (4%) - 9.88 (4.49%) Satisfactorily revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Exemplary 90-100% A 9.9 (4.5%) - 11 (5%) Thoroughly revised the previous assignment based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:PAD530-A4-2 2. Evaluate the practicality of union presence in your selected agency and recommend at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Weight: 15%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; did not submit or incompletely recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Fair 70-79% C 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; partially recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Proficient 80-89% B 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; satisfactorily recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Exemplary 90-100% A 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly evaluated the practicality of union presence in your selected agency; thoroughly recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not have union representation. (Title this section The Agency and Unions) Feedback:PAD530-A4-3 3. Evaluate the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency and recommend at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Weight: 15%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; did not submit or incompletely recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Fair 70-79% C 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; partially recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Proficient 80-89% B 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; satisfactorily recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Exemplary 90-100% A 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly evaluated the opportunity of privatization in your selected agency; thoroughly recommended at least two (2) reasons why the agency should or should not privatize its services. (Title this section The Agency and Privatization) Feedback:PAD530-A4-4 4. Analyze at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Weight: 15%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Fair 70-79% C 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Proficient 80-89% B 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Exemplary 90-100% A 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly analyzed at least two (2) of the agency’s policies, procedures, and / or plans regarding pensions. (Title this section Employee Pension Plans) Feedback:PAD530-A4-5 5. Assess the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Weight:15%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Fair 70-79% C 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Proficient 80-89% B 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Exemplary 90-100% A 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly assessed the agency’s approach to productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback:PAD530-A4-6 6. Recommend at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Weight:15%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 23.08 (10.49%) Did not submit or incompletely recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Fair 70-79% C 23.1 (10.5%) - 26.38 (11.99%) Partially recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Proficient 80-89% B 26.4 (12%) - 29.68 (13.49%) Satisfactorily recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Exemplary 90-100% A 29.7 (13.5%) - 33 (15%) Thoroughly recommended at least three (3) actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of productivity and performance evaluation. (Title this section Recommendations for Improving Productivity and Performance Evaluation) Feedback:PAD530-A4-7 7. 4 references. (Include no more than one non-government Website) Weight: 10%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 15.38 (6.99%) Does not meet the required number of references Fair 70-79% C 15.4 (7%) - 17.58 (7.99%) Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Proficient 80-89% B 17.6 (8%) - 19.78 (8.99%) Meets number of required references; all references good quality choices. Exemplary 90-100% A 19.8 (9%) - 22 (10%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. Feedback:PAD530-A4-8 8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 70% F 0 (0%) - 15.38 (6.99%) More than 6 errors present Fair 70-79% C 15.4 (7%) - 17.58 (7.99%) 5-6 errors present Proficient 80-89% B 17.6 (8%) - 19.78 (8.99%) 3-4 errors present Exemplary 90-100% A 19.8 (9%) - 22 (10%) 0-2 errors present Feedback: The rubric total value of 209.00 has been overridden with a value of 215 out of 220.0.Feedback to Learner
Name:PAD530 Week 9 Assignment 4: Analysis of the Agency’s Policies, Procedures, and Plans Regarding Unions, Privatization, Pensions, and Productivity, Part 4
Description:PAD530 Week 9 Assignment 4: Analysis of the Agency’s Policies, Procedures, and Plans Regarding Unions, Privatization, Pensions, and Productivity, Part 4
