Nursing Nutrition in Health and Disease
Miss Cookie
RubricDetailNURS225NutritioninHealthandDisease2.htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: Final Research Paper: Disease and Nutrition
Description: Research Paper: Disease and Nutrition
| Meets or Exceeds Expectations | Mostly Meets Expectations | Below Expectations | Not Meeting Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Diet Identification and Analysis of Nutrients | Points: Points Range: 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Accurately identifies all details of three macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats, and provides detailed examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Accurately, identifies most details of three macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats, and provides some detailed examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Accurately identifies the details of one to two macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO and fats, but does not provide detailed examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not identify details of macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats Feedback: |
| Part 1: Diet RDA Approval Analysis | Points: Points Range: 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Identifies details for five or more key micronutrients that meet RDA approval and provides detailed explanations for each. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Identifies details for five or more key micronutrients that meet RDA approval and provides one or two explanations. Some explanations may be vague. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Identifies detail for 1–4 key micronutrients that meet RDA approval. Detailed explanations are not provided Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not identify or explain any key micronutrients that meet RDA approval. Feedback: |
| Part #2: Disease Nutrition and Pathophysiology | Points: Points Range: 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Accurately details how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease. Provides three or more specific examples. Accurately details and analyzes the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease in general. Provides specific examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Details how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease but may show some areas of confusion or slight inaccuracy. Provides three examples. Provides some detail and analysis for the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease but may show some areas of confusion or inaccuracy. Provides some specific examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Provides confusing, vague, or inaccurate information on how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease. Provides fewer than three specific examples. Provides a vague or inaccurate analysis for the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not provide dietary or nutritional analysis. Feedback: |
| Part #2: Disease Medical and Nutrient-Related Interventions and Dietary Needs | Points: Points Range: 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Accurately describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines with only one error. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines with multiple errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not describe nutritional interactions. Feedback: |
| Part 3: Patient Education/Care Plan Nutrient Calculations | Points: Points Range: 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Accurately calculates the five required figures for this patient and identifies additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Calculates the five required figures for this patient with only one error, and identifies additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Calculates 1–4 of the required figures for this patient, but there are several errors. Does not identify additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not provide calculations, or all calculations are incorrect. Feedback: |
| Part 3: Patient Education/Care Plan SMART Goals and Patient Care Plan | Points: Points Range: 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Provides three well-written and clear SMART goals. Offers 2–3 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient, and considers all aspects of the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Provides three SMART goals, but some may lack clarity. Offers 2–3 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient, and considers most aspects of the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Provides one to two SMART goals; several may lack clarity. Offers 1–2 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient; may not show consideration for the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not provide SMART goals or nursing strategies. Feedback: |
| APA and Mechanics | Points: Points Range: 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Feedback: |
Part 1: Diet Identification and Analysis of Nutrients--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Accurately identifies all details of three macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats, and provides detailed examples. Mostly Meets Expectations 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Accurately, identifies most details of three macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats, and provides some detailed examples. Below Expectations 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Accurately identifies the details of one to two macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO and fats, but does not provide detailed examples. Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not identify details of macronutrients in excess/deficient of CHO, PRO, and fats Feedback:Part 1: Diet RDA Approval Analysis--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Identifies details for five or more key micronutrients that meet RDA approval and provides detailed explanations for each. Mostly Meets Expectations 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Identifies details for five or more key micronutrients that meet RDA approval and provides one or two explanations. Some explanations may be vague. Below Expectations 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Identifies detail for 1–4 key micronutrients that meet RDA approval. Detailed explanations are not provided Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not identify or explain any key micronutrients that meet RDA approval. Feedback:Part #2: Disease Nutrition and Pathophysiology--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Accurately details how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease. Provides three or more specific examples. Accurately details and analyzes the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease in general. Provides specific examples. Mostly Meets Expectations 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Details how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease but may show some areas of confusion or slight inaccuracy. Provides three examples. Provides some detail and analysis for the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease but may show some areas of confusion or inaccuracy. Provides some specific examples. Below Expectations 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Provides confusing, vague, or inaccurate information on how the diet from Part 1 would affect the patient and the disease. Provides fewer than three specific examples. Provides a vague or inaccurate analysis for the ways that nutrition affects the pathophysiology of the disease. Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not provide dietary or nutritional analysis. Feedback:Part #2: Disease Medical and Nutrient-Related Interventions and Dietary Needs--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Accurately describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines. Mostly Meets Expectations 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines with only one error. Below Expectations 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Describes how medicines interact with key nutrients, and details several nutrient recommendations and restrictions for this patient based on diet and medicines with multiple errors. Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not describe nutritional interactions. Feedback:Part 3: Patient Education/Care Plan Nutrient Calculations--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) Accurately calculates the five required figures for this patient and identifies additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Mostly Meets Expectations 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) Calculates the five required figures for this patient with only one error, and identifies additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Below Expectations 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) Calculates 1–4 of the required figures for this patient, but there are several errors. Does not identify additional calculations as appropriate for the patient’s care plan. Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) Does not provide calculations, or all calculations are incorrect. Feedback:Part 3: Patient Education/Care Plan SMART Goals and Patient Care Plan--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 39.6 (18.00%) - 44 (20.00%) Provides three well-written and clear SMART goals. Offers 2–3 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient, and considers all aspects of the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Mostly Meets Expectations 33.44 (15.20%) - 39.16 (17.80%) Provides three SMART goals, but some may lack clarity. Offers 2–3 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient, and considers most aspects of the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Below Expectations 26.4 (12.00%) - 33 (15.00%) Provides one to two SMART goals; several may lack clarity. Offers 1–2 specific nursing strategies and examples for the patient; may not show consideration for the patient’s lifestyle (i.e., culture, religion, activity level). Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 25.96 (11.80%) Does not provide SMART goals or nursing strategies. Feedback:APA and Mechanics--
Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds Expectations 19.8 (9.00%) - 22 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. Mostly Meets Expectations 16.72 (7.60%) - 19.58 (8.90%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. Below Expectations 13.2 (6.00%) - 16.5 (7.50%) The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. Not Meeting Expectations 0 (0.00%) - 12.98 (5.90%) No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Feedback:Name:Final Research Paper: Disease and Nutrition
Description:Research Paper: Disease and Nutrition
