Assignment - REDO - Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 1/8

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and brie�y describe your chosen

clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical

81 (81.00%) - 90 (90.00%)

The presentation clearly and accurately identi�es and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question.

The presentation clearly and accurately identi�es

72 (72.00%) - 80 (80.00%)

The presentation accurately identi�es and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately identi�es at least four

63 (63.00%) - 71 (71.00%)

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identi�es and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation inaccurately or

60 (60.00%)

0 (0.00%) - 62 (62.00%)

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identi�es and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest

or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately

Name: NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 2/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poorissue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer- reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be speci�c and provide examples.

y four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer- reviewed articles selected.

The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA citations for at least four peer- reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

The presentation includes speci�c and relevant examples that fully support the research.

The presentation provides a complete, detailed,

and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer- reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least

research databases used to conduct a search for the peer- reviewed articles selected.

The presentation accurately provides APA citations for at least four peer- reviewed articles selected, including an adequate explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented.

The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the peer- reviewed articles

selected. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course- speci�c resources that may support

y vaguely identi�es at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer- reviewed articles selected.

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer- reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented.

The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate

synthesis or outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The response minimally integrates

inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identi�es less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer- reviewed articles selected,

including an inaccurate and vague explanation of the strengths of

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 3/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

g two outside resources and two or three course- speci�c resources that fully support the presentation.

y pp the presentation.

g resources that may support the presentation.

the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research, or is missing.

The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing.

The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to

support the presentation or is missing.

Feedback:

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 4/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor APA - citations - see et al. rule and apply in citations with more than 2 authors. See common ref list examples in writing center and how to format journal articles per APA. Be sure to utilize at least two �ltered databases when conducting search for systematic reviews. Databases such as Joanna Briggs and Cochrane. Articles selected and not representative of Systematic Review, they are primary research articles. Therefore, no points can be earned for said articles. See page 171 in textbook. A systematic review is secondary research -- uses research

that was conducted previously (primary research). Systematic Reviews are extremely

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 5/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor are extremely detailed and look at throughout many databases to collect all the primary research studies done on the topic. See page 171 in textbook. A systematic review is secondary research -- uses research that was conducted previously (primary research). Systematic Reviews are extremely detailed and look at throughout many databases to collect all the primary research studies done on the topic. Level of Evidence in Peer-Reviewed Articles - be sure to share for each of the peer-reviewed articles the level of evidence based on a particular source - explain - did this

represent the Hierarchy of Evidence (see textbook page 18 or other course

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 6/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor other course resources), or John Hopkins Level of Evidence shared? Remember, Level 1 are considered the highest level and representative of Systematic Reviews --- in primary studies, such as the articles you located, those are lower on the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. List all reference together on the last Reference page - include all. In presentation include a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. From the articles you located, what strengths did you note from the systematic review -- - did it shed some

light into discovery of the PICOT answer? What other strengths from systematic reviews

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 7/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor systematic reviews did you learn about from various course resources?

Written Expression and Formatting— Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.50%)

3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60– 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or o� topic.

Feedback: always have a clear purpose statement and conclusion

0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion are provided.

Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards:

5 (5.00%)

5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)

4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and

3.5 (3.50%) - 3.5 (3.50%)

Contains several (three or four)

0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) Contains many (�ve or more) grammar, spelling, and

4/7/2021 Rubric Detail – NURS-6052C-11/NURS-6052N-11-QTR-Term-wks...

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_23360427_1&course_id=_16807916_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_2195203_1&vi… 8/8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

p g, punctuation errors.

( ) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

p g, punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Raw Total: 68.50 (of 100)

Name:NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric EXIT