Assignment 1: Primary and Secondary Research Articles

3/1/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237513_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Name: PUBH_6128_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 1 Assignment 1 Rubric Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT

Grid View List View

3/1/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237513_1 2/4

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Demonstration of understanding of primary vs. secondary resources by correctly identifying and describing the speci�c features of the two articles provided by your Instructor, comparing and contrasting what is similar and di�erent between these resources and explaining how these features support that the resource is primary or secondary

0 (0%) - 7 (17.5%)

Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately demonstrate understanding of primary vs. secondary sources by correctly identifying and describing the speci�c features of the two articles provided by your Instructor, comparing and contrasting the resources and explaining how these features support that the resource is primary or secondary

8 (20%) - 8 (20%)

Adequately demonstrate understanding of primary vs. secondary sources by correctly identifying and describing the speci�c features of the two articles provided by your Instructor, comparing and contrasting the resources and explaining how these features support that the resource is primary or secondary, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (22.5%) - 9 (22.5%)

Generally thorough and well organized and supported demonstration of understanding of primary vs. secondary sources by correctly identifying and describing the speci�c features of the two articles provided by your Instructor, comparing and contrasting the resources and explaining how these features support that the resource is primary or secondary, with minimal concerns

10 (25%) - 10 (25%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly demonstration of understanding of primary vs. secondary sources by correctly identifying and describing the speci�c features of the two articles provided by your Instructor, comparing and contrasting the resources and explaining how these features support that the resource is primary or secondary

3/1/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237513_1 3/4

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Identi�cation of a full text primary research article on the same biological topic and supporting that this article is primary by analyzing and explaining the features that indicate it is a primary source

0 (0%) - 7 (17.5%)

Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately identify a full text primary research article on the same biological topic and support that this article is primary by analyzing and explaining the features that indicate it is a primary source

8 (20%) - 8 (20%)

Adequately identi�ed a full text primary research article on the same biological topic and supported that this article is primary by analyzing and explaining the features that indicate it is a primary source, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (22.5%) - 9 (22.5%)

Generally thorough and well organized identi�cation of a full text primary research article on the same biological topic and support that this article is primary by analyzing and explaining the features that indicate it is a primary source, with minimal concerns

10 (25%) - 10 (25%)

Fully developed, insightful, credible, and scholarly identi�cation of a full text primary research article on the same biological topic and support that this article is primary by analyzing and explaining the features that indicate it is a primary source

Re�ection on how being able to distinguish primary versus secondary articles will help you as a public health professional

0 (0%) - 7 (17.5%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately re�ect on how being able to distinguish primary versus secondary articles will help you as a public health professional

8 (20%) - 8 (20%)

Adequate and supported re�ection on how being able to distinguish primary versus secondary articles will help you as a public health professional, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (22.5%) - 9 (22.5%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported re�ection on how being able to distinguish primary versus secondary articles will help you as a public health professional, with minimal concerns

10 (25%) - 10 (25%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible re�ection on how being able to distinguish primary versus secondary articles will help you as a public health professional

3/1/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16811594_1&rubric_id=_2237513_1 4/4

  Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Written Communication: Extent to which writing and reference list is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly

0 (0%) - 7 (17.5%)

Writing does not meet basic expectations for a paper (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, source citation, references, synthesis of source material, insu�cient originality, etc.).

8 (20%) - 8 (20%)

Adequately meets writing expectations for a paper, but with infrequent and minor issues

9 (22.5%) - 9 (22.5%)

Writing is generally sound, structurally and grammatically correct, and properly formatted, with minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting.

10 (25%) - 10 (25%)

Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.

Total Points: 40

Name: PUBH_6128_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric

Description: PUBH 6128D Module 1 Assignment 1 Rubric Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT