literature review topic human capital theory

9/23/19, 9(25 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 2https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_id=_1214337_1

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Superior Criteria Excellent Criteria Satisfactory Criteria Marginal Criteria Unsatisfactory Criteria

Not Submitted

Element 1: Critical Analysis

21 (30%) Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Several sources and examples support thinking.

19.95 (28.5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. There are one or two minor errors.

17.85 (25.5%) Student presents a critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing with some details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Some sources and examples support thinking.

15.75 (22.5%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with vague or missing details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and/or describing with vague or missing details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Few sources or examples support thinking.

10.5 (15%) Does not meet minimal standards.

0 Did not submit element.

Element 2: Synthesis

21 (30%) Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. Several sources and examples support thinking.

19.95 (28.5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. There are one or two minor errors.

17.85 (25.5%) Student presents a synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining with some details the relationship of the study to existing literature. Some sources and examples support thinking.

15.75 (22.5%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with vague or missing details describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and/or does not explain the relationship of the study to existing literature. Few sources or examples support thinking.

10.5 (15%) Does not meet minimal standards.

0 Did not submit element.

Element 3: Critical Thinking

7 (10%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale.

6.65 (9.5%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale.

5.95 (8.5%) Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing

5.25 (7.5%) Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the

3.5 (5%) Does not meet minimal standards.

0 Did not submit element.

Name: DDBA_8300_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

9/23/19, 9(25 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 2https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_id=_1214337_1

Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments.

Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.

synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly.

classroom experiences and content; nor analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well- reasoned arguments are not exhibited.

Element 4: Written Delivery Style & Grammar

10.5 (15%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

9.97 (14.25%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

8.93 (12.75%) Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

7.88 (11.25%) Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

5.25 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.

0 Did not submit element.

Element 5: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)

10.5 (15%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

9.97 (14.25%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

8.93 (12.75%) Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

7.88 (11.25%) Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

5.25 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.

0 Did not submit element.

Name: DDBA_8300_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT