Progressive disciplinary process
aundisims
RubricDetailHumanResourceManagementBUS310047VA016....htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: w07a1
Description: Progressive Disciplinary Process
| Unacceptable( Below60%) | Needs Improvement(60-69%) | Satisfactory(70-79%) | Competent(80-89%) | Exemplary(90-100%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem, includes detailed corrective and positive feedback, and sets future expectations. | Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not document first conversation with employee. Feedback: | Points: 31.2 (19.50%) Documents first conversation with employee that identifies the employee performance problem but fails to set future expectations and offer performance-related feedback. Feedback: | Points: 36 (22.50%) Documents first conversation with employee that identifies employee performance problem and sets future expectations but lacks constructive and positive feedback. Feedback: | Points: 40.8 (25.50%) Documents first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem and sets future expectations but lacks detail about how feedback is both corrective and positive. Feedback: | Points: 48 (30.00%) Documents first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem, includes detailed corrective and positive feedback, and sets future expectations. Feedback: |
| Describe steps for discipline that are progressive, contain clear consequences, and are connected to descriptions of employee performance. | Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not identify steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences. Feedback: | Points: 31.2 (19.50%) Identifies steps for employee discipline that are not progressive or not clearly tied to performance. Feedback: | Points: 36 (22.50%) Identifies steps for employee discipline that are progressive but lack description of consequences and/or employee performance. Feedback: | Points: 40.8 (25.50%) Describes steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences but with descriptions of employee performance that need elaboration. Feedback: | Points: 48 (30.00%) Describes steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences and connected to descriptions of employee performance. Feedback: |
| Recommend employee consequences for performance issues that are supported by documented incidents. | Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not make a recommendation about employee consequences for the company director. Feedback: | Points: 31.2 (19.50%) Recommends employee consequences for performance issues, but the recommendation is not supported by documentation entries or the progressive disciplinary plan; or, it does not align with the performance issues described. Feedback: | Points: 36 (22.50%) Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan but at least one documentation entry needs elaboration or does not support the recommendation. Feedback: | Points: 40.8 (25.50%) Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan and are supported by documented incidents, but minor details are missing or incorrect. Feedback: | Points: 48 (30.00%) Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan and are supported by documented incidents. Feedback: |
| Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. | Points: 0 (0.00%) Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons throughout that distract from the message. Nine or more errors present. Feedback: | Points: 10.4 (6.50%) Writing has numerous spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 7–8 errors present. Feedback: | Points: 12 (7.50%) Writing has distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 5–6 errors present. Feedback: | Points: 13.6 (8.50%) Writing has minor spelling, punctuation, and minor distracting grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3–4 errors present. Feedback: | Points: 16 (10.00%) Writing has negligible spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0–2 errors present. Feedback: |
Document first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem, includes detailed corrective and positive feedback, and sets future expectations.--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable( Below60%) 0 (0.00%) points Does not document first conversation with employee. Needs Improvement(60-69%) 31.2 (19.50%) points Documents first conversation with employee that identifies the employee performance problem but fails to set future expectations and offer performance-related feedback. Satisfactory(70-79%) 36 (22.50%) points Documents first conversation with employee that identifies employee performance problem and sets future expectations but lacks constructive and positive feedback. Competent(80-89%) 40.8 (25.50%) points Documents first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem and sets future expectations but lacks detail about how feedback is both corrective and positive. Exemplary(90-100%) 48 (30.00%) points Documents first conversation with employee that describes employee performance problem, includes detailed corrective and positive feedback, and sets future expectations. Feedback:Describe steps for discipline that are progressive, contain clear consequences, and are connected to descriptions of employee performance.--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable( Below60%) 0 (0.00%) points Does not identify steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences. Needs Improvement(60-69%) 31.2 (19.50%) points Identifies steps for employee discipline that are not progressive or not clearly tied to performance. Satisfactory(70-79%) 36 (22.50%) points Identifies steps for employee discipline that are progressive but lack description of consequences and/or employee performance. Competent(80-89%) 40.8 (25.50%) points Describes steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences but with descriptions of employee performance that need elaboration. Exemplary(90-100%) 48 (30.00%) points Describes steps for employee discipline that are progressive in their consequences and connected to descriptions of employee performance. Feedback:Recommend employee consequences for performance issues that are supported by documented incidents.--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable( Below60%) 0 (0.00%) points Does not make a recommendation about employee consequences for the company director. Needs Improvement(60-69%) 31.2 (19.50%) points Recommends employee consequences for performance issues, but the recommendation is not supported by documentation entries or the progressive disciplinary plan; or, it does not align with the performance issues described. Satisfactory(70-79%) 36 (22.50%) points Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan but at least one documentation entry needs elaboration or does not support the recommendation. Competent(80-89%) 40.8 (25.50%) points Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan and are supported by documented incidents, but minor details are missing or incorrect. Exemplary(90-100%) 48 (30.00%) points Recommends employee consequences for performance issues that align to the progressive disciplinary plan and are supported by documented incidents. Feedback:Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.--
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable( Below60%) 0 (0.00%) points Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons throughout that distract from the message. Nine or more errors present. Needs Improvement(60-69%) 10.4 (6.50%) points Writing has numerous spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 7–8 errors present. Satisfactory(70-79%) 12 (7.50%) points Writing has distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 5–6 errors present. Competent(80-89%) 13.6 (8.50%) points Writing has minor spelling, punctuation, and minor distracting grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3–4 errors present. Exemplary(90-100%) 16 (10.00%) points Writing has negligible spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0–2 errors present. Feedback:Name:w07a1
Description:Progressive Disciplinary Process
