Assignment 3: Strategic Value of Employee Benefits Programs

profilepenwil
RubricDetailHRM599006VA016-1202-001.pdf

2/23/2020 Rubric Detail – HRM599006VA016-1202-001

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_20929088_1&course_id… 1/3

Unacceptable 0- 69% F Fair 70 - 79% C Proficient 80 - 89% B

Exemplary 90 - 100% A

HRM599-A3-1 1. Identify and discuss at least three (3) important variables that almost always should be considered by organizations when providing employee benefits programs. Be sure the response is specific and relevant.

0 (0.00%) - 17.595 (10.35%) Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed at least three (3) important variables that almost always should be considered by organizations when providing employee benefits programs and did not make sure the response is specific and relevant.

17.85 (10.50%) - 20.145 (11.85%) Partially identified and discussed at least three (3) important variables that almost always should be considered by organizations when providing employee benefits programs and partially made sure the response is specific and relevant.

20.4 (12.00%) - 22.695 (13.35%) Satisfactorily identified and discussed at least three (3) important variables that almost always should be considered by organizations when providing employee benefits programs and satisfactorily made sure the response is specific

22.95 (13.50%) - 25.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly identified and discussed at least three (3) important variables that almost always should be considered by organizations when providing employee benefits programs and thoroughly made sure the response is specific and relevant.

HRM599-A3-2 2. Compare and contrast income protection programs and pay for time not worked programs, both of which are usual elements of benefits programs. How are the programs similar? Are they mandatory?

0 (0.00%) - 11.73 (6.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted income protection programs and pay for time not worked programs and did not address programs’ similarity and whether mandatory or not.

11.9 (7.00%) - 13.43 (7.90%) Partially compared and contrasted income protection programs and pay for time not worked programs and partially addressed programs’ similarity and whether mandatory or not.

13.6 (8.00%) - 15.13 (8.90%) Satisfactorily compared and contrasted income protection programs and pay for time not worked programs and satisfactorily addressed programs’ similarity and whether mandatory or not.

15.3 (9.00%) - 17 (10.00%)

Thoroughly compared and contrasted income protection programs and pay for time not worked programs and thoroughly addressed programs’ similarity and whether mandatory or not.

Name: HRM599 Week 8 Assignment 3: Strategic Value of Employee Benefits Programs

Description: HRM599 Week 8 Assignment 3: Strategic Value of Employee Benefits Programs ExitExit

Grid View List View

2/23/2020 Rubric Detail – HRM599006VA016-1202-001

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_20929088_1&course_id… 2/3

Unacceptable 0- 69% F Fair 70 - 79% C Proficient 80 - 89% B

Exemplary 90 - 100% A

HRM599-A3-3 3. Research and discuss at least four to five (4-5) of what may be referred to as “Other Benefits” that you could recommend to the management team as necessary elements for the benefits package. HINT: Flextime and product/service discounts are good examples.

0 (0.00%) - 23.46 (13.80%)

Did not submit or incompletely researched and discussed at least four to five (4-5) of what may be referred to as “Other Benefits” that could be recommended to the management team as necessary elements for the benefits package.

23.8 (14.00%) - 26.86 (15.80%) Partially incompletely researched and discussed at least four to five (4-5) of what may be referred to as “Other Benefits” that could be recommended to the management team as necessary elements for the benefits package.

27.2 (16.00%) - 30.26 (17.80%) Satisfactorily incompletely researched and discussed at least four to five (4-5) of what may be referred to as “Other Benefits” that could be recommended to the management team as necessary elements for the benefits package.

30.6 (18.00%) - 34 (20.00%) Thoroughly incompletely researched and discussed at least four to five (4-5) of what may be referred to as “Other Benefits” that could be recommended to the management team as necessary elements for the benefits package.

HRM599-A3-4 4. Develop an employee benefits package for any exempt or non- exempt position level of your choosing making sure you support the selection of your program elements.

0 (0.00%) - 35.19 (20.70%)

Did not submit or incompletely developed an employee benefits package for any exempt or non-exempt position level of your choosing, and did not make sure the selection of program elements was supported.

35.7 (21.00%) - 40.29 (23.70%) Partially developed an employee benefits package for any exempt or non-exempt position level of your choosing, and partially made sure the selection of program elements was supported.

40.8 (24.00%) - 45.39 (26.70%) Satisfactorily developed an employee benefits package for any exempt or non-exempt position level of your choosing, and satisfactorily made sure the selection of program elements was supported.

45.9 (27.00%) - 51 (30.00%) Thoroughly developed an employee benefits package for any exempt or non-exempt position level of your choosing, and thoroughly made sure the selection of program elements was supported.

HRM599-A3-5 5. 4 references

0 (0.00%) - 5.865 (3.45%)

No references provided.

5.95 (3.50%) - 6.715 (3.95%) Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

6.8 (4.00%) - 7.565 (4.45%) Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7.65 (4.50%) - 8.5 (5.00%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

HRM599-A3-6 6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

0 (0.00%) - 5.865 (3.45%)

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

5.95 (3.50%) - 6.715 (3.95%) Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

6.8 (4.00%) - 7.565 (4.45%) Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

7.65 (4.50%) - 8.5 (5.00%)

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

2/23/2020 Rubric Detail – HRM599006VA016-1202-001

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_20929088_1&course_id… 3/3

Unacceptable 0- 69% F Fair 70 - 79% C Proficient 80 - 89% B

Exemplary 90 - 100% A

HRM599-A3-7 7. Appropriate Use of APA In-Text Citations and Reference

0 (0.00%) - 5.865 (3.45%)

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

5.95 (3.50%) - 6.715 (3.95%) In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

6.8 (4.00%) - 7.565 (4.45%) Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

7.65 (4.50%) - 8.5 (5.00%)

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

HRM599-A3-8 8. Information Literacy/Integration of Sources

0 (0.00%) - 5.865 (3.45%)

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in- text citations.

5.95 (3.50%) - 6.715 (3.95%) Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

6.8 (4.00%) - 7.565 (4.45%) Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

7.65 (4.50%) - 8.5 (5.00%)

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

HRM599-A3-9 9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

0 (0.00%) - 5.865 (3.45%)

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

5.95 (3.50%) - 6.715 (3.95%) Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

6.8 (4.00%) - 7.565 (4.45%) Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

7.65 (4.50%) - 8.5 (5.00%)

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Name:HRM599 Week 8 Assignment 3: Strategic Value of Employee Benefits Programs

Description:HRM599 Week 8 Assignment 3: Strategic Value of Employee Benefits Programs ExitExit