2011East African Drought
urjiabdi
RubricDetailGenderandDisasterfinal.htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: Disaster Cycle Research Paper
| Not Addressed | Below Average | Average | Very Good | Exceptional | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction One paragraph highlighting the importance of examining this particular disaster in the context of gender and intersectional identities with in the disaster cycle, including a thesis statement | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 6 (4.44444%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 6.5 (4.81481%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.92592%) - 8.5 (6.29629%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (6.66666%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback: |
| Background and History Summary of the disaster, including: type of disaster; date; location/region; scope of disaster; mortality; number of people affected/displaced/injured Pertinent information of gendered politics in this particular area that will help to understand vulnerability before, during, and after the disaster | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 15 (11.11111%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 16 (11.85185%) - 19 (14.07407%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 19.5 (14.44444%) - 22 (16.29629%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 22.5 (16.66666%) - 25 (18.51851%) Feedback: |
| Disaster Cycle At least one paragraph addressing each stage in the disaster cycle (total of at least 8) as it relates to gender and other identities Exposure to risk; Risk perception; Preparedness behavior; Warning communication and response; Physical impacts; Psychological impacts; Emergency response; Recovery and reconstruction (these two can be together or separate If there is limited information in any section, explain why this may be the case and how it can remedied in the future | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 39.5 (29.25925%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 40 (29.62962%) - 47.5 (35.18518%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 48 (35.55555%) - 53.5 (39.62962%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 54 (40.00%) - 60 (44.44444%) Feedback: |
| Conclusion One to two paragraphs to summarize findings, lessons learned, and ideas for improvement and growth | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback: |
| Formatting Written in APA format, 1" margins, 12 point Times New Roman, with a Title and References Pages according to APA Guidelines (not included in your total page count) Headers used to separate sections of paper In-text citations in APA format | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback: |
| Organization Paper is organized, clearly written, with no spelling or grammatical errors | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback: |
| Resources Utilizes a minimum of 8 scholarly resources (at least half must be sources not included in course materials) | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 1 (0.74074%) - 6 (4.44444%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 6.5 (4.81481%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8 (5.92592%) - 8.5 (6.29629%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9 (6.66666%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback: |
Introduction One paragraph highlighting the importance of examining this particular disaster in the context of gender and intersectional identities with in the disaster cycle, including a thesis statement--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 6 (4.44444%) Average 6.5 (4.81481%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Very Good 8 (5.92592%) - 8.5 (6.29629%) Exceptional 9 (6.66666%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback:Background and History Summary of the disaster, including: type of disaster; date; location/region; scope of disaster; mortality; number of people affected/displaced/injured Pertinent information of gendered politics in this particular area that will help to understand vulnerability before, during, and after the disaster--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 15 (11.11111%) Average 16 (11.85185%) - 19 (14.07407%) Very Good 19.5 (14.44444%) - 22 (16.29629%) Exceptional 22.5 (16.66666%) - 25 (18.51851%) Feedback:Disaster Cycle At least one paragraph addressing each stage in the disaster cycle (total of at least 8) as it relates to gender and other identities Exposure to risk; Risk perception; Preparedness behavior; Warning communication and response; Physical impacts; Psychological impacts; Emergency response; Recovery and reconstruction (these two can be together or separate If there is limited information in any section, explain why this may be the case and how it can remedied in the future--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 39.5 (29.25925%) Average 40 (29.62962%) - 47.5 (35.18518%) Very Good 48 (35.55555%) - 53.5 (39.62962%) Exceptional 54 (40.00%) - 60 (44.44444%) Feedback:Conclusion One to two paragraphs to summarize findings, lessons learned, and ideas for improvement and growth--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Average 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Very Good 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Exceptional 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback:Formatting Written in APA format, 1" margins, 12 point Times New Roman, with a Title and References Pages according to APA Guidelines (not included in your total page count) Headers used to separate sections of paper In-text citations in APA format--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Average 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Very Good 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Exceptional 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback:Organization Paper is organized, clearly written, with no spelling or grammatical errors--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 2.5 (1.85185%) Average 3 (2.22222%) - 5 (3.7037%) Very Good 5.5 (4.07407%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Exceptional 8 (5.92592%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback:Resources Utilizes a minimum of 8 scholarly resources (at least half must be sources not included in course materials)--
Levels of Achievement: Not Addressed 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Below Average 1 (0.74074%) - 6 (4.44444%) Average 6.5 (4.81481%) - 7.5 (5.55555%) Very Good 8 (5.92592%) - 8.5 (6.29629%) Exceptional 9 (6.66666%) - 10 (7.4074%) Feedback:Name:Disaster Cycle Research Paper
